Categories
Stories In Focus

Glamour and Humility Reign at the Oscars

Acceptance speeches highlight political issues amidst the sparkle of Hollywood.

Every year as the cold of winter settles into my creaking bones and no sign of sun rises on the horizon there is one night that manages to lift my spirits and give me a reason to cheer, argue, wonder about and remind me why I fell in love with film in the first place- The Oscars.

Yes- I understand the Academy is corrupt, I understand that what is decided that night is not the most objective determination of what the best things happening in the industry are, and I understand you have to take it with a grain of salt- but when you see the glamour, the discussion, the bright lights and big performances- you can’t help but be swept away in it all.

4764440136_3f75b62db4_bThis year Oscars were hosted by none other than Neil Patrick Harris. Harris kept this year’s style light and quippy with a few pointed jabs here and there that ultimately won over audiences both at the event and at home. However the witty host also made the first challenging comment of the night saying in his opening speech, “Tonight we honor today’s best and whitest- I mean brightest.” The joke opened what was to be a theme that night- using the Academy Awards as an opportunity to question the status quo.

Historically the awards have been just that- a night set aside to rain accolades and pat backs. The winners would give quick thank-you speeches and the night was, although glamorous, quite brief. Over the years there have been exceptions- speeches that surprised us or moved us. Who could forget Halle Berry’s acceptance speech when she was the first black woman to win an Oscar for Best Actress? But in recent years the Oscars have become increasingly more political, more profound and more thought-provoking. Speeches have begun to stand for something and this year is the best example to date.

This year we saw two exceptionally well-deserved Oscars go to performances portraying lives wrought with severe illness- Julianne Moore playing a professor fading from early onset Alzheimer’s (Still Alice-heartbreaking, beautiful, powerful) and Eddie Redmayne as none other than Stephen Hawking as he deteriorates from ALS (The Theory of Everything– classic, methodical, elegant). Both winners dedicated their awards to those suffering with the illnesses and Moore spoke eloquently on the red carpet speaking to the misconceptions of Alzheimer’s in general.

But Moore was not the only woman to give an interesting interview on the red carpet. Much attention was given to the launch of the campaign “AskHerMore” which encouraged interviewers to ask the actresses on the red carpet more than just about her outfit. Fittingly this was followed later in the night by Best Supporting Actress Patricia Arquette’s acceptance speech in which she called for equal pay and treatment of women in the workplace. The speech, though somewhat controversial, caused an outcry of support- even bringing the one and only Meryl Streep to her feet in excitement.

Arquette won her award for the innovative film Boyhood by Richard Linklater which follows the lives of a single mother and her two children for twelve years, the same amount of time he used to film it. As the viewer watches the film unfold he or she are also watching the actors grow along with it. The film is new and interesting and beautifully made. It also ultimately calls into question issues of abuse and women’s rights and is therefore so fitting to be a voice for Arquette’s call to arms.

Not-so-subtle Arquette was followed by a similarly long-standing issue of social justice which still needs some work- the civil rights movement. The film Selma, though not a front-runner, is a beautiful look at Dr. Martin Luther King’s march from Selma to Montgomery in 1965. This year the film took home the award from best original song which left barely a dry eye in the house. Upon accepting their speech writers John Legend and Common used the opportunity to discuss current discrimination in the US saying, “We know that the Voting Rights Act that they fought for 50 years ago is being compromised right now in this country today. We know that right now, the struggle for freedom and justice is real. We live in the most incarcerated country in the world. There are more black men under correctional control today than were under slavery in 1850. We are with you, we see you, we love you and march on.”

And lastly, this year’s best picture and best director awards were given to the incredible film, Birdman and even it was sure to make sure it made a political point. Birdman is a dark comedy which follows the dying career of an ex-superhero film star. We see him struggling to hold himself together with a last-ditch effort at re-boosting his career through a self-directed Broadway play. The film is surreal and beautiful and shot as one continuous tracking shot almost to the very end. Michael Keaton, Emma Stone, and the whole cast deliver performances that are edgy, surprising, and heart-wrenching. Director Alejandro González Iñárritu keeps each scene singular with innovative crossing narratives and beautiful ways of playing with time. The film is truly a masterpiece and the director a treasure. As he moved to accept his second Oscar of the night he closed with a brief silence, a look of humility and said he dedicated his award to “My fellow Mexicans. The ones who live in Mexico, I pray that we can find and build a government that we deserve and for the ones who live in America I hope you are treated with the same dignity and respect as those who came before them and helped build this country.”

It seems fitting that such a night full of glamour and opulence should end on such a note of humility. Film has always been about other worlds- other ways of seeing. But it is refreshing to see it challenged as art should be. For that reason this year’s Oscars should be one to be remembered- not only for the fine films and deserved awards, for Lady Gaga’s awesome performance and John Travolta’s second hilarious bumble- but also for the ideas that were challenged and hope that films and those making them can aid in changing our world for the better.

Categories
Opinions

Meta-Opinions from the Fishbowl

Everyone has opinions.  I’ve got a lot.  Sometimes, being generous, I like to share mine.  Sharing apples leaves one with fewer apples; sharing opinions is cost-free.  Come by; I’ll share.

It’s nice when you and I have the same opinion.  I don’t have to explain myself.  Indeed, I don’t have to think at all.  We can be at ease, even if wrong!

But sometimes your opinion differs from mine. This can cause difficulties. Not always; some things just don’t matter. And when both of us agree that it doesn’t matter, we are good. Let’s go to lunch.

We sometimes disagree about things that do matter. Or I think they do.  Sometimes I choose to keep my opinion to myself.  (It’s true!)  Disagreements about things that matter can fray relationships.  And sometimes the relationship matters more than the differing opinions do.  Let’s just not talk about it, ok?  We’ll go to lunch, but talk about something else.

There are times when I want to know what your opinion is. I’ll ask.  Maybe just hearing your opinion is enough.  You said so and you should know.

But sometimes I need more.  I need to know more, to understand more fully.  I need to understand why you hold that opinion, what reasons there might be for thinking that what you believe to be the case actually is the case. Maybe I have no opinion myself.  Maybe I have a contrary opinion.  Maybe I even share yours.  Nonetheless, I’m seeking reasons.  What do you have to say in favor of your opinion?  And if all you can say in favor of your opinion is that it is yours, put it in your autobiography.  In the chapter on trivia.

Giving reasons can be hard, sometimes nearly impossible.  But when I ask, please don’t do a power play with me.  “Because I said so” is the redoubt of last resort for the insecure (and the route to sanity for parents of toddlers). If that’s all you’ve got, I’ll seek wisdom elsewhere.

I do have a point.  There is an ethic of opinion giving—and opinion seeking—grounded in the basic ethical concept of respect.

But first consider three types of relationships, varying in authority and responsibility.  There are relationships of equality, those between friends, teammates, spouses or colleagues.  There are relationships of significant difference, those between parent and child, coach and team member, professor and student, doctor and patient, plumber and client, or Creator and creature.  And there are relationships of contingent difference in which the difference in authority is not grounded in inherent differences between the parties. Consider an R.A. and a student resident. Yes, one has responsibilities the other lacks.  And with those come a certain kind of authority.  Yet the two roles could easily be reversed.  The same holds between committee members and committee chairs, department chairs and department members, team captains and team members, and, often, between employment managers and their subordinates.  Even between presidents and senators.

Those on this third list each involve shared tasks, and shared tasks require structure, including some division of labor.  Leadership is one—only one—necessary role.  Countries, committees, and colleges all require leaders.  But these are only roles, contingently held.

fisher_quoteYou’re the R.A. because you were selected from among other qualified applicants.  You happen to be the department chair, but not because you are smarter or know more than your colleagues.  You were chosen to be captain because you are liked and respected, but other team members could do the job just as well.

Now, my two ethical points about opinions:

First, opinions about things that matter should come with reasons.  Not always.  Less often in relations of essential difference.   Usually in relations of equality.  And they are very important, but too frequently avoided, in relations of contingent difference.   Give an opinion, often in the form of a chosen course of action, from a position of contingent authority?  Be prepared to give reasons.  Respect for others involved in the shared task requires it.

And second, those who contingently occupy positions of heightened responsibility should seek the opinions—and accompanying reasons—of others who share the task.  Respect—and good decision making—requires it.

Categories
Opinions

Inequality Blues in the Ivory Tower

The original impetus to write this article stemmed from a frustrating discussion on Marx and the plight of the proletariat in one of my philosophy courses, however things took off after I saw one of VOCA’s inserts on a table in the cafeteria. In advertising their resumé workshops, VOCA juxtaposed the outcomes of both a good and bad resumé. On the top half of one of the ads,  VOCA slapped the bolded phrase “GOOD RESUME” over a white male dressed in business casual, sitting with his laptop in a high-rise office building; an image that screams moderate-to-high paying corporate job. The bottom half featured the phrase “NOT SO GOOD RESUME” superimposed over a grocery store worker pushing carts in from the snowy parking lot, dressed plainly in khakis, work boots, and a fluorescent vest; the typical effigy of the working class.

chaisson_quote VOCA’s message to Houghton students is anything but subtle: get your resume together or else you will end up like the poor sap working the dead-end job pushing carts, instead of sitting on a leather couch in a suit and tie. This is perhaps the most explicit shaming of the blue-collar worker and blue-collar jobs in general that I have seen thus far at Houghton. Last year’s “Theology +” advertisements to “find your calling” hinted at a similar message: a “calling” or a vocation is more than “just a job,” which is what I would guess most people here on campus would characterize blue-collar work as. This glorification of vocation over a simple job imposes an unavoidable value-judgment on those with a vocation versus those with “just a job.”

Whether it is intentional or not, this trend of shaming blue-collar workers and devaluing their jobs is disturbing. I am well aware that those of us attending a private liberal arts college intend to find jobs in a more white-collar environment, and I want to clarify that I’m not attacking anyone’s desire or preference to do so. Regardless of the fact that Houghton plays a crucial role for those of us seeking these types of jobs, it does not give the institution or its members the right to devalue jobs. After all, there are plenty of blue-collar workers here at Houghton. How offensive is it for VOCA to put out these public advertisements that devalue their jobs, their livelihood, and their vocations?

It should be no surprise to anyone here that people have an overwhelming tendency to equate a person with their job. Let me elaborate. People in suits, men and women who have their names on office doors and degrees hanging on their walls, are accorded respect and a sense of status by the vast majority. People who work at McDonald’s or wear fluorescent vests at work are rarely given the same level of respect, let alone thought of as having power or status in society. Thus, we equate the value of the work with the value of the person: those doing work that is valued higher socially (white-collar) are personally accorded more value and respect, while those working lesser valued jobs are, more often than not, seen as lesser in status, and thus given less respect and subsequently value. This value-driven attitude, however subconsciously it may arise, is reinforced practically everywhere–including Houghton–and inevitably, it creates a culture of white-collar superiority, so to speak.

In emphasizing the importance of a vocation–and of a good resume to get there–the message that comes across emphasizes this attitude of inequality. It tells students: Do this or you’ll regret it. What I am proposing as the alternative is not some “how-to” on “grinning and bearing it” through some sort of blue-collar purgatory, rather a change in perspective on the value of “just a job”. Perhaps it is as simple as this: the value often awarded to white-collar jobs is based on some cost-benefit analysis related to various factors, happiness being a popular one. For some, money buys happiness, for others respect, power, and status do, ergo we flock to white-collar jobs. However, a recent survey done in 2012 by City & Guilds on “Career Happiness Index” shows that those with more blue-collar jobs (e.g. florists, hairdressers, and plumbers) have the highest happiness indexes that range from 76%-87%, while white-collar jobs follow closely with the highest index ratings ranging from 69%-75%. Interestingly enough, bankers and IT workers wind up in dead last, with happiness index ratings ranging from 44%-48%. I bring up this study to demonstrate that, at least in terms of happiness, working a blue-collar job is not a death sentence; there is value to be had.

What I’m recommending is not that everyone work a blue-collar job, or that white-collar workers are inherently crummy people; I’m asking primarily for there to be a shift in attitude on this issue towards equality. Whether you end up as a doctor researching a cure for cancer, a successful lawyer, an electrician, or a retail employee, you–and your job–deserve an equal amount of respect and value.

Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor 3/6/2015

Dear Editor:

You may have noticed the posters which have recently been put up around campus advertising for the VOCA office. Two pictures on each poster show the contrast between two employment situations, and the captions read: “Good résumé, bad résumé.” The “good résumé” photo shows a well-dressed, smiling white-collar worker, while the “bad résumé” photo is of an obviously dissatisfied laborer performing a menial task.

While this is a clever and eye-catching way to advertise for the VOCA office and its services, I believe that the message it sends is far from the intentions a Christian is supposed to have in regards to employment. The message conveyed by the posters is this: if you develop a good résumé, you will then be able to secure a successful job, whereas if your résumé stinks, you’ll be stuck serving fast food at McDonalds.

To suggest that there is something wrong with doing work which comes with a high salary is certainly not my intention. However, there is also nothing wrong with spending a lifetime joyfully being a witness for Christ at a McDonalds cash register. I applaud the VOCA office’s mission of connecting students with “opportunities to serve” and preparing them to “participate in the work [God] is doing on earth.” That being said, perhaps we should consider the way that Jesus would serve people fast food: probably with a smile.

 

Ellenore Tarr, Class of 2018

 

Categories
News

ISIS Beheads Egyptian Christians

Last weekend, a video surfaced of the Jihadist group, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), showing the beheadings of 21 men. All of these men except one, according to National Public Radio (NPR), were Christian laborers from Egypt.

article-coptic16n-6-webBeheadings have not been uncommon for ISIS. On August 13, 2014 ISIS released a video showing the beheading of U.S. journalist and ISIS hostage, James Foley. On September 13, 2014, yet another video, this time showing the murder of British aid worker, David Haines, is released. Then once more on October 3 and once again November 16, 2014 ISIS released videos of the deaths of British minicab driver, Alan Henning, and U.S. aid worker, Peter Kassig.

This particular set of murders by ISIS differs than the previous. According to Abraham Bashr Aziz, who was present during the kidnapping and is also a brother of one of the deceased, ISIS was specifically looking hostages who were Christian. He said, “I heard them screaming, and I heard them asking about the Christians. They just came to kidnap the Christians.” The kidnapping, however, was not random. According to NPR, the gunmen who came to kidnap Aziz, along with his friends and relatives, had a list of names. Aziz was one of the names on the list.

Egypt’s response to the beheadings was one of violence and retaliation. According to CNN Sunday, Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi proclaimed his country “reserves the right of retaliation and with the methods and timing it sees fit for retribution for those murderers and criminals who are without the slightest humanity.” According to Reuters, an international news agency based in London, on Monday, February 16, Egyptian jet bombed Islamic State targets in Libya. An umbrella group of Islamists in Derna reported the bombing had killed women and children, and in addition warned Egypt of a “harsh and painful” response to come.

The terror from ISIS, however, did not stop there. According to CNN, an Iraqi official has recently confirmed that the town of al-Baghdadi, located in the province of Anbar, has been burned to the ground. With this town an additional 40 officers and tribesmen were burned alive. While the group has not posted photos of the murders on social media as they have in the past, there is reason to believe the Jihadist group is solely responsible for the murders and destruction. The proof comes from the social media updates bragging of their control of al-Baghdadi via photographs. These photographs included images of the recognizable government buildings in al-Baghdadi, along with corpses of the Iraqi joint forces located there.

Categories
News

Houghton Islamic Studies Partners with Lilias Trotter Center

This Monday, Islamic Studies professors Benjamin Hegeman and Don Little, along with President Shirley Mullen and Dean of the College, Linda Mills-Woolsey officially signed a partnership with the Lilias Trotter Center to offer Islamic Studies courses at Houghton. The Lilias Trotter Center, based out of Orlando, Florida, is a collaboration with Pioneers and Serving In Mission (SIM) and enables Christian engagement with Muslims. The Center partnered with Houghton allowing the College to continue the study of Islam by offering courses to better understand Muslim people and the Muslim world. Currently, the agreement with The Lilias Trotter Center and Houghton College is for 18 months, but if the courses are continued to seen as a value to the College, the partnership will continue.

LiliasTrotterSigning1_LukeLauer
From left to right: President Shirley Mullen, Dean Linda Mills-Woolsey, Professor Don Little, and Professor Benjamin Hegeman sign 18 month agreement between the Lilias Trotter Center and Houghton College on Monday Feb. 16.

Currently, Introduction to Islamic Foundations is being offered this semester and is the first course that Houghton has offered residentially and online at the same time. By recording lectures and putting them online, students from all over the world including Kenya and Switzerland are able to learn about Islamic theology and culture. Throughout the course, students are learning about Islam by looking at the three Islam texts: Qur’an, Hadiths, and Sira.  Bethany Rudolph ‘17 said she is taking the course, “to gain a deeper understanding of Islam, to be able to have conversations with Muslims, and to understand what the religion is about.”

LiliasTrotterSigning3_LukeLauer
From left to right: (Back row) Professor Don Little, Gail Schlooser, Professor Benjamin Hegeman (Front Row) Dean Linda Mills-Woolsey and President Shirley Mullen.

Because of budget restrictions, in December of 2013, it looked as though Islamic Studies would be no longer offered at Houghton. Little said, “we needed to know the future of the program and President Mullen invited me to speak out on why we needed Islamic Studies courses.” Throughout the spring semester of 2014, the Lilias Trotter Center and Houghton were communicating about the possibility of a partnership. In May of 2014, an agreement was set between the two organizations and today, they are now in a officially in partnership. Hegeman said, “I’m impressed with President Mullen and her invitation to continue the Islamic Studies programs.” A new Lilias Trotter full-time faculty member, Dr. Gail Schlosser, has joined the Islamic Studies program here at Houghton as well.

Hegeman explains that it is important for anyone in the global community to learn about Islam culture and theology. Senior Tyler Reese explains that her only impression of Muslims before taking this course was what she saw in the media, which she described as terrorist bombings. “I wanted to take this class to have a greater understanding of what provoked those actions and what these people were thinking when they planning such attacks.” Rudolph mentioned that it is easy for people to only listen and to believe to what mass media is telling us about a certain group, such as Muslims. “It’s created a very skewed image of Muslims,” said Rudolph., “Tthe courses that Dr. Little and Dr. Hegeman teach have helped me untangle those ideas and shape a better understanding of what Muslims really believe.,” she said.

Within five years, Little hopes that Houghton will be a main base for teaching Lilias Trotter courses. “We can bring on other Lilias Trotter staff members and work together to serve the local community and the Muslim community,” said Little. These professors are aware of budget restraints but have received a lot of praise for the program. “We realize that it’s an opportunity and challenge,” said Hegeman. In fall of 2015, there will be a new course in Islam offered called Islam: a Christian Introduction. Little said the course will be a general introduction to Islam culture and theology and the department is working on the course to serve as Integrative Studies credit. To find out more about the Lilias Trotter Center, please visit liliastrottercenter.org

Categories
Reviews Stories In Focus

Return to the Radio: Alternative Buffalo 107.7 Review

“Your reason to return to radio has arrived” is a phrase commonly quipped on Buffalo’s radio station  Alternative Buffalo FM 107.7. It is a motto they live up to. The station surprisingly reaches all the way out to Houghton with reception extending across campus. It even has a mobile app or you can listen online. It is a relatively new station that has already got a lot going for it. It gives an excellent alternative for those who are tired of your typical pop radio station tunes, such as Iggy Azalea, Taylor Swift, or One Direction. For those who have forsaken radio altogether in favor of their iPod, try returning to this radio station.

Alt Buffalo plays a wide range artists ranging from legends like Nirvana to young new artists such as George Ezra. Popular artists such as Bastille, Lorde, Hozier, and Coldplay are commonly featured on the station, some even before they became international hits. Along with these big names are lesser known, but equally talented and entertaining musical artists. Alt Buffalo plays many up-and-coming or obscure artists, giving music lovers the opportunity to expand their musical library. Some artists you might discover include Panama Wedding, Catfish and the Bottlemen, Sir Sly, and Glass Animals.

Especially focused on the theme of discovery is the “The Underground Collective” session on Sunday nights 6-8pm. During this time they play only “underground” and indie rock artists, ones you mostly likely have not heard of, but that the station believes deserve to be listened to.

Similarly, “Localized” on Sunday nights 8-9pm features artists from Buffalo, Western New York, and surrounding areas. Local musicians can submit their music for the opportunity to gain exposure and listeners can hear local talented musicians. Joywave, a band out of Rochester, NY is now receiving a little more national attention, was featured on Localized.

Compared to similar alternative stations in other regions, Alt Buffalo keeps itself to the more indie and true alternative side of things. Other similar alternative stations sometimes begin to feel like a borderline pop station by playing too many top chart artists like Imagine Dragons or Fall Out Boy. While 107.7 does play some popular artists that fit into the indie or alternative genres, they steers clear of artists who do not belong on their station.

One drawback to Alt Buffalo is sometimes it can get slightly repetitive. If you listen too often you may find yourself hearing to the same songs multiple times in a week, which is perhaps a flaw of music radio stations in general. As more music comes out, however, they are always updating their playlists.

Besides just the radio station, a new and exciting addition to the Buffalo area from Alt Buffalo is their concert series. One of these series, called “You Saw Them First,” features lesser-known artists they expect to become big. Featured last spring was Bear Hands, who have their hit single “Giants.” Bear Hands went on to perform at Alt Buffalo’s big concert, the first Kerfuffle.

The unforgettable Kerfuffle concert happened in July at Canal Side under the skyway in Buffalo. It featured artists Bricks and Mortar, Semi-Precious Weapons, the Kongos, the Bleachers, and Cage the Elephant. Going from 3 to 11 p.m., the show had 10,000 people and was well-worth the price of admission.

With the success of summer concert and the growing popularity of the radio station, Alt Buffalo hosted the Kerfuffle Before Christmas. The concert featured artists Airborne Toxic Event, Jungle, Robert Delong, Neon Trees, and Walk the Moon – who recently came out with a new album, Talking is Hard.

Categories
Stories In Focus

Ready Before It Happens: Emergency Preparedness at Houghton College

Ray Parlett, as the director of campus safety and security, has to deal with emergencies before they happen.

Parlett defined an emergency as “anything that has the potential to cause a threat to life or property or disrupt our operations” in reference to Houghton. Emergencies range from levels one to four, from water leaks and individual injury to major fires and natural disaster. He writes the emergency plan which is the reference for how to approach these emergencies as they come.

Emergency-Action-Plan-8.15.11Parlett wrote his first emergency plan in 1999, and “essentially rewrote it” in 2008, in large part because of the emphasis on specific individuals instead of general positions. As people moved on, references to specific names were no longer applicable. To resolve this, a general contact page was created, listing the positions, the corresponding individuals, and their information. “As we have transitions, we can change that page,” Parlett explained.

This idea of a general framework in fact applies to the entire philosophy of the emergency plan. In considering emergencies, Parlett explained that a lot of what goes into creating an emergency plan is “identifying key players in general types of issues.” This is logical, because as Parlett put it, “they are the ones dealing with it.”

He further noted that “the critical part of that is having the right people in the right place.”

Essentially knowing who to call and where to gather is so important because not every scenario can be predicted. “There is no plan that has every possible contingency,” Parlett explained. If you tried to anticipate every way a situation could go, “the plan would be so cumbersome you would not remember it.” It would be an “impractical reference.”

Parlett’s emphasis on generalities comes from his understanding of emergencies. “Emergency by nature is fluid, fluctuating all the time,” he said. He noted, with a smile, that you cannot expect an emergency to go “as planned.” How, then, are they to be dealt with? Parlett identified flexibility as “absolutely critical,” and further noted drills as an effective way to practice it. “That is the value of doing a drill. It forces you to exercise flexibility and recognize how necessary flexibility really is.”

This was demonstrated in a Gillette fire drill two years ago. The planned situation was meant to replicate a major fire, and while the drill was going on, one of the key people involved had an asthma attack. “It demonstrated that even in an orchestrated situation things didn’t go as planned,” Parlett said. Those dealing with the “emergency” had to adapt to the situation as it came.

Training, then, is an essential aspect of emergency preparedness. Accordingly, the most recent revisions to the emergency plan have come from the “education perspective.” Faculty and staff are being trained to respond to the “more catastrophic” emergencies, when they would need to “take charge.”

Parlett noted that students and faculty the have the chance to be informed as quickly as possible. He encourages students to sign up for WENS, the wireless emergency notification system. Through this they can be notified of an emergency occurring by email or text. Students can sign up online through a student portal, and faculty through a faculty portal. An email will soon be sent out with more specifics about WENS. Students and faculty can rest assured, then, that a plan is in place with the appropriate personnel to deal with any emergency and that they will know about it as soon as possible.

Categories
Stories In Focus

Musician of the Week: Malcolm J. Bell

Malcolm J. Bell, a senior music composition major, has always had a love and passion for music. A native from Buffalo, New York, Malcolm began playing the piano when he was three years old. Throughout his childhood years, he had developed the skill of composition and directing gospel choirs. Later in his teenage years he began to receive recognition for his work in performance, composition, and directing which included recognition from Western New York’s Business First magazine as an “Extra Curricular Star” Currently at Houghton, Malcolm is involved in many musical ensembles such as Symphonic Winds, The Philharmonia Orchestra, College Choir, Houghton Jazz and various chamber groups at Houghton. In addition to participating in these ensembles, Malcolm has served as the director of the Houghton Gospel Choir for the past three years. Eventually, Malcolm hopes to earn a doctorate in either music composition or music theory so that he can teach in the college classroom. Some of Malcolm’s hobbies are reading, writing literature, and watching the Buffalo Bills.

Malcolm RGB

Check out Malcolm’s work at:

http://youtu.be/ztsld-M6ptI
http://youtu.be/8G_iOa53I_U
http://youtu.be/-iHbhU1T8rA
Categories
Opinions

Living in Tension: Climate Change, Critics, and Convictions

On Tuesday night, I had the privilege of hearing Dr. Katharine Hayhoe speak on the topic of climate change. Considering that there have been only eighteen possible chapel credit opportunities so far this year, it’s safe to assume that most of the student body attended chapel this Wednesday in the quest towards the elusive twenty-seven. If you were one of those students, the following ideas will not be foreign to you.

Climate change is real. Climate change is detrimental. Climate change is caused by human activity.

I believe these statements are true. Frankly, if you disagree with me, the point of this article is not to convince you otherwise. If you have questions about climate change, I would highly recommend reading Dr. Hayhoe’s book, “A Climate for Change: Global Warming Facts for Faith Based Decisions” or watching the 2014 Emmy Award-winning non-fiction mini-series “Years of Living Dangerously” among other resources. If 97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real and caused by human activity, then it goes without saying that we should take climate change seriously.

That being said, the tension felt within the areas of faith and environmentalism is not entirely new to me. I have been interested and aware of environmental issues for as long as I can remember. The ideas of caring for creation and stewardship had always been a part of my Christian faith. The intersections of climate change, justice, and human flourishing have fit together seamlessly in my mind. Why care about the planet? Because humans live on the planet, that’s why. It seemed simple to me.

In September of 2014, a group of Houghton students, including myself, went to New York City for the Peoples Climate March, the largest march on climate change in history. For me, the march represented a movement of solidarity between all groups of people, despite the differences in the values held by each group. Afterwards, however, I was unprepared for the lack of support and downright disapproval my friends and I received for going to the march.

Christian family members criticized our participation, saying that it was a waste of time. Christian friends told us that we should be more focused on the condition of people’s souls than the condition of the planet. Christians supported us too, but the negative interactions left an overwhelmingly bad taste in my mouth, and I realized that the bad rep Christians have when it comes to environmental issues is not entirely unfounded. Where did this leave me?  As a Christian who felt strongly about the impact of climate change on all aspects of creation, human and non-human, was I too “Christian” to align myself with environmentalists, or too “environmentalist” to align myself with other Christians?

As Dr. Hayhoe pointed out on Tuesday evening, science can tell us what climate change is and how it is happening, but science cannot tell us why we should care. Science can tell us which parts of the world are feeling the severest effects of climate change, but science can’t motivate us to care for human life and inherent dignity. Science can’t, but faith can.  My faith calls me to love my neighbor as myself (Mark 12:31). My faith calls me to love in action and truth (1 John 3:18).  My faith calls me to have a sound mind (2 Timothy 1:7).

In short, I am faced with the reality that climate change is negatively affecting the lives of people across the globe right now and will continue to do so in the future without human intervention. On the basis of my faith, I must think clearly and critically in order to love my neighbor in truth and action.  Therefore, I realize that I must approach climate change with an understanding of the strengths and the limitations of science, and with humility and love for God’s creation.

There is tension present between Christians and Environmentalists: I realize this.

Yet in my mind, my role as a Christian and my role as an Environmentalist are concerned with one thing: people. People’s lives matter, both in the present and for eternity. Climate change, by its very nature, is not something you can be ambivalent about. The consequences of climate change for the human race are real and serious. Members of the Christian faith are faced with the reality that caring for people’s souls without caring for people’s physical condition is to care for neither at all. Until the climate change is recognized by the members of my faith as being real and serious, I choose to live in the tension between Christians and Environmentalists. And as the planet continues to experience climate change, that tension will only increase for all of us.