Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor 3/6/2015

Dear Editor:

You may have noticed the posters which have recently been put up around campus advertising for the VOCA office. Two pictures on each poster show the contrast between two employment situations, and the captions read: “Good résumé, bad résumé.” The “good résumé” photo shows a well-dressed, smiling white-collar worker, while the “bad résumé” photo is of an obviously dissatisfied laborer performing a menial task.

While this is a clever and eye-catching way to advertise for the VOCA office and its services, I believe that the message it sends is far from the intentions a Christian is supposed to have in regards to employment. The message conveyed by the posters is this: if you develop a good résumé, you will then be able to secure a successful job, whereas if your résumé stinks, you’ll be stuck serving fast food at McDonalds.

To suggest that there is something wrong with doing work which comes with a high salary is certainly not my intention. However, there is also nothing wrong with spending a lifetime joyfully being a witness for Christ at a McDonalds cash register. I applaud the VOCA office’s mission of connecting students with “opportunities to serve” and preparing them to “participate in the work [God] is doing on earth.” That being said, perhaps we should consider the way that Jesus would serve people fast food: probably with a smile.

 

Ellenore Tarr, Class of 2018

 

Categories
Stories In Focus

Musician of the Week: Malcolm J. Bell

Malcolm J. Bell, a senior music composition major, has always had a love and passion for music. A native from Buffalo, New York, Malcolm began playing the piano when he was three years old. Throughout his childhood years, he had developed the skill of composition and directing gospel choirs. Later in his teenage years he began to receive recognition for his work in performance, composition, and directing which included recognition from Western New York’s Business First magazine as an “Extra Curricular Star” Currently at Houghton, Malcolm is involved in many musical ensembles such as Symphonic Winds, The Philharmonia Orchestra, College Choir, Houghton Jazz and various chamber groups at Houghton. In addition to participating in these ensembles, Malcolm has served as the director of the Houghton Gospel Choir for the past three years. Eventually, Malcolm hopes to earn a doctorate in either music composition or music theory so that he can teach in the college classroom. Some of Malcolm’s hobbies are reading, writing literature, and watching the Buffalo Bills.

Malcolm RGB

Check out Malcolm’s work at:

http://youtu.be/ztsld-M6ptI
http://youtu.be/8G_iOa53I_U
http://youtu.be/-iHbhU1T8rA
Categories
Opinions

Redeeming Gender: Title IX at Houghton

Last week’s STAR described recent mandates concerning the 1972 Federal law on gender equity known as “Title IX” to the problem of relationship violence on campuses.  Students at Houghton can celebrate that they live in an environment free of much of the outwardly destructive behavior that characterizes many schools.   What, then, does Title IX have to do with Houghton?   The goal of Title IX at Houghton is to promote the education of students, specifically as this relates to Houghton Goal #5:  “Ground students in a strong biblical worldview in the Wesleyan tradition that allows them to be deeply and thoughtfully Christian so as to transform culture through redeeming action.”    Much of the conversation I hear around campus falls short of the standard of being “deep” or “thoughtful” and much of our energy seems devoted to defending a particular stereotyped vision of gender roles rather than invested in “redeeming action”.   Houghton must do a better job of preparing its students to be leaders in the area of gender equity.

NancyMurphyFormer President Jimmy Carter’s A Call to Action:  Women, Religion, Violence, and Power states, “ . . . in my opinion, Jesus Christ was the greatest liberator of women in a society where they had been considered throughout biblical history to be inferior.”  If we are followers of Christ, we must be fearless in opening ourselves to the possibility that the privileges we enjoy hinder us from seeing the extent of the work yet to be done.   In calling us to be agents of redemption in the world, is Christ calling us to be “Human Rights’ Activists”?  If so, what does this look like?  Perhaps just as importantly, what are the distractions or petty disagreements that seem to draw us away from our calling?

My job as Title IX Coordinator is to encourage thoughtful consideration of questions such as, “In what ways are we influenced by the larger culture regarding gender in a way that is harmful to our understanding of what it means to be created in God’s image?   How do both women and men contribute to and sustain the difficulties we have in relating to one another in Christ-honoring ways?  How does language impact our views of women and men?  What implications are there for using the word ‘girls’ to describe females over 18 and using ‘men’ or ‘guys’ to describe males over 18?   Why don’t we have a universal policy of gender-friendly language for our course syllabi?”

Nancy_quoteIf they are to follow Christ’s lead in gender justice, Houghton graduates must wrestle with questions, such as, Why does the self-confidence of girls decrease sharply just as they reach puberty?  Why is it okay to use disparaging comments when referring to girls and women (e.g. “You throw like a girl” – see SuperBowl 49 commercial)?  Why do women speak less in mixed groups, including during class discussions?  How much should it concern us that the phrase,” I totally raped you!”, is likely to refer to beating someone in a videogame?  Why is it that so many young women, including Christians, feel that they owe a man something if he compliments them and pays attention to them?  How can Christian women be empowered to have a voice and to assert themselves while nurturing the belief that Christians are to place service to others above self?   How does a culture of patriarchy within the church contribute to a climate of female restraint and male entitlement that hinders the full development of both men and women?    How do we respond to the complaint from a sister or brother that something we have said or done has negatively impacted her or him, regardless of any lack of intent to do harm?

Transformation needs to occur, but first we seek the truth with humility. Thankfully, Christ and scriptures such as Galatians 3:28, which states “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus”  give us direction.   As Emma Brittain noted in, How Houghton Handles Racism,  “. . . if we are not sensitive to race, we can’t be intentional about combating racism.”    We must open ourselves up to conversations that are difficult, that make us uncomfortable, and on which we disagree. This is the best way to hold ourselves and one another accountable.   There is work to be done at Houghton.

Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor: Rebekah Bunal

Dear Editor,

I have concerns about the man who spoke in chapel this past Friday.  My big question is why did he still want to be identified as a homosexual then even though he doesn’t practice homosexuality?  As Christians when we first accept Christ, we are brand new.  Our past is behind us and we can live a new life with God on our side.  2 Corinthians 5:17 (NLT) states, “This means that anyone who belongs to Christ has become a new person. The old life is gone; a new life has begun!”  This man doesn’t have to struggle with sin anymore.  God has made him new.  His identity is in Christ.

Galatians 3:25-26 (NLT) strongly proclaims, “And now that the way of faith has come, we no longer need the law as our guardian. For you are all children of God through faith in Christ Jesus.”  I don’t understand why this man wanted to be known by his sin and not be identified as a child of God.  God healed people of their illness, He has fed the 5000, and He most importantly conquered death!  If the man claims he is a follower of Christ, I don’t see why God couldn’t heal him.

This universe is endlessly big.  Our human problems are not impossible for God.  I have heard some people who try consoling say it isn’t successful for this issue.  Matthew 19:26 (NLT) strongly claims, “Jesus looked at them intently and said, “Humanly speaking, it is impossible. But with God everything is possible.”  God doesn’t always quickly heal people in an instant.  It can take some time.

We need to be there for people who struggle with this sin.  I don’t hate homosexuals.  I believe we need to pray and love them.  I believe wholeheartedly that God who created this vast universe and who has conquered death can heal homosexuals.  I think this should be Houghton’s new direction with this issue.

By Rebekah Marie Bunal, Class of ’16

Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor: Matt Young

Dear Editor,

Last Friday the Chapel speaker was Dr. Wesley Hill, a gay, celibate, Christian. He advocated that Christians who are gay, should live a life of celibacy. He summed up his stance by saying, “I gave up marriage as a commitment to Christ.” He, along with with many members of the Houghton community, believe that God requires celibacy for all who are not hetroxexual. And this is what I have a problem with.

My problem is with belief in a God who supports this view of giving up marriage for Christ.What kind of God creates someone with a sexual attraction that they can NEVER act on? What kind of God expects his children to give up the possibility for the intimate relationship that only a marriage can provide, to abandon and alienate ourselves from a fundamental part of who we are? An evil one! A God not worthy of believing in, let alone following. This is not the God of the Christian narrative. Thankfully, there is another way of relating to that God.

Dr. Hill and others want LGBT people to give up marriage as a commitment to Christ. And I agree that we do need to give up something as a commitment to Christ. But it’s not marriage that needs to go. No, we need to give up God as a commitment to Christ. In order to commit to the loving, graceful, accepting, expansive, humanity-embracing way of Christ, we need to give up that former view of God. The God that creates people with an attraction they can never act on, that expects us to give up the benefits of marriage, that wants us to forsake a fundamental aspect of what makes us human, he has got to go! Thankfully there are other ways of interpreting Scripture, other ways of viewing God. The God who is oppressive, demanding, and asks us to forsake our humanity is not worth our time. So join me in giving him up. Give up God as a commitment to Christ.

Matt Young – Radical Theology Advocate,  Philosophy Major, Class of 2018

 

Categories
International News

Mass Death Sentence in Egypt

An Egyptian court on Monday, February 1st 2015, sentenced 183 Muslim Brotherhood supporters to death. The court proceedings were held over the killing of 11 police officers in the violence that had engulfed Egypt after the 2013 dismissal of the former Islamist president, President Mohammed Morsi.

The attack took place after Egyptian military forces cracked down on Islamist supporters of Morsi in July 2013. Egyptian security forces descended onto two pro-Morsi camps in July and August 2013, killing hundreds.

JoePoyfairAt the end of July and beginning of August 2013, hundreds of demonstrators were killed by Egyptian security forces. The Human Rights Watch said that this mass killing of protesters “probably amounts to crimes against humanity,” thus creating an international outcry that was quickly quieted by the Egyptian government.

The United Nations has called the trials “unprecedented.” Amnesty International’s Deputy Middle East and North Africa Program Director, Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, said in a statement in response to Monday’s verdict.  “The death sentences are yet another example of the bias of the Egyptian criminal justice system.”

Sahraoui further stated that “issuing mass death sentences whenever the case involves the killing of police officers now appears to be near-routine policy, regardless of facts and with no attempt to establish individual responsibility.”

The original trial saw 377 people sentenced to life in prison in absentia, while not present at the event being referred to.  Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui said it would be wrong to impose the capital punishment “when there are serious doubts hanging over the fairness of the trial which disregarded international law.”

The Egyptian court did not put 183 individuals to death lightly. The Egyptian government has been attempting to fight against terrorism in Egypt. Muslim extremism has seen an increase in central Egypt in the past decade, and President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has been fighting against these extremists.

Egypt’s current government, led by President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, has called for a ‘religious revolution’ and asked Muslim leaders to help in the fight against extremism. President el-Sisi has launched a war against terrorism, focusing particularly on the countries Sinai region, where an extremist group recently pledged allegiance to ISIS.

In an act of counter extremism, Egyptian authorities cracked down in 2013 on former supporters of Morsi, a longtime member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which the Egyptian government had officially declared a terrorist organization in December 2013

In a speech on New Year’s Day, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi called for a “religious revolution” in Islam that would displace violent jihad from the center of Muslim discourse. “Is it possible that 1.6 billion people should want to kill the rest of the world’s population, [which] is 7 billion people, so that they themselves may live?” President el-Sisi asked.

“We have to think hard about what we are facing,” President el-Sisi said. “It’s inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire Islamic world to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing, and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible.”

Categories
Opinions

How Houghton Handles Racism

Racism is a problem in America, throughout the world, and yes in Houghton as well. Racism, as I want to simply define it here, is a systemic and sometimes very unintentional devaluing of the lives of people of color. It is not limited to rude remarks; it’s most damaging roots lie in institutions which destroy lives through  denying people of jobs, housing, and freedom. Houghton graduates will have the chance to fight against this sort of racism as they go out into their fields of work- but to do that they must first be educated on it.

Emma.BrittainHoughton has tried to be more intentional when talking about racism in organized discussions. As a student of color, attending these discussions has shown me that even my peers who truly care about racial issues do not know how to approach the discussion. I believe without education everyone is a racist. We are shaped by our society and human nature to believe certain stereotypes. Unless we educate ourselves and try to break harmful patterns of conduct, we will be ensnared by racism.

Frequently in regards to racial issues, I hear Houghton students say “There are no races, I don’t see race.” But if we are not sensitive to race we can’t be intentional about combating racism. Sensitivity is a huge problem for discussions about racism, particularly when the majority of the participants are white. When I was in high school multiple times everyday I was referred to as “Black Emma” or other things that made me constantly aware that as a mixed (Black and White) girl I was an unwanted minority. Not seeing color was a privilege I was unable to have. Both fortunately and unfortunately this isn’t true for the “average Houghton student”; it is good that not everyone experiences racism even though it makes it harder for them to understand the issue.

For Instance, when people at Houghton who lead discussions about race are not themselves people of color, discussion is, once again, difficult. These facilitators are incredibly gracious and  they truly care about people of color, yet they lack the experience of racism and thus lack the high sensitivity toward it. Sometimes as a student of color, I have wished that there was a person of color in administration that I could go talk to about racism. It is uncomfortable for me to go to a white male and try to explain my experiences. Also, when there are deep pains in the Black community at large, the white males in Houghton aren’t entirely tuned in to this. Last school year the student body was told that regular chapel discussions about race would take place. However, I was personally upset this past semester when no such discussion became a reality. I checked on the planning process a few times and I was told they were trying to find a better time to hold them, however, I felt that discussions still should have been held while the future plans were in the works. The lack of discussion makes racism seem like something we only talk about when racial incidents take place, rather than presenting racism in its true light as being a constant problem. When we finally had a campus event to talk about Ferguson I felt like this just furthered the idea that if we talk about these topics a few times, then they will disappear. In reality, these topics impact the daily lives of people across the nation and around the world. When I explained these thoughts to the discussion organizers, they were immediately regretful that their efforts had appeared that way to me. I hope that in the future, race can be a continued conversation at Houghton.

Houghton has done a good job opening these conversations so perhaps someday soon we can have a person of color lead them and white students listen. I say white students in particular because I know many white students feel uncomfortable going to talks about racism, especially with the fear of being called racists. This is something we as a community can easily get over to move forward in changing the world- one Houghton graduate at a time.

Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor Issue 12

Dear Editor,

I was disappointed with the news article “Riots in Ferguson Cause Unrest” in the last [Dec. 5, 2014] issue. It was unfortunately biased. The title starts out the piece with a questionable cause and effect relationship. Doesn’t unrest cause riots? I think it’s safe to assume that the unrest was there long before the riots. Or better yet, we need not try to mention any solid cause and effect relationship. A much better title could have been chosen.

Regardless, as the article continues it severely undermines the voice of the protesters. Calling the shooting of Mike Brown a “not so ordinary incident” expresses bias because a major aspect of the controversy surrounding this case is that it is believed that this is not a rare occurrence. Then, it is implied that all the protests were violent and the article fails to truly explain why the protests even occur upon first mentioning them. Then the account of the event, although it is mentioned as being debatable, is given from the final court decision, ignoring the voice of the protesters and their slogan “Hands up don’t shoot.” While you can say the evidence seems to support the side given —  it is important to explain why the protesters are protesting by representing their point of view especially as they responded before the court case and release of evidence.

Towards the end of the article the questions surrounding racism are finally brought to attention, but with some false conclusions. After the paragraph of quotes from President Obama about the “legacy of racial discrimination” it is said “these statements reflect the facts that Ferguson County consists of predominantly black communities”. The quotes used do not reflect that at all. Other assumptions are made that had just as little obvious correlation.

Overall the article was a disservice to the Houghton community. Many of the students here have not been following the Ferguson case or any others, and it is difficult for them to understand the complexity of Ferguson through this article. Some fine tuning could make this article much more informative.

Thank You,

Emma Brittain

Class of 2016

Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor Issue 12

Dear Editor,

Regarding last [Dec. 5, 2014] week’s letters, it seems that Ms. Wool, class of ’16, and Mr. Oliver, class of ’15, can’t see the whole point of the new napkin policy.  Neither did I at first.  But, it is fully explained for all to see on the new, snazzy, dispensers:  “Better for you” they proclaim in bold print.  Smaller, yet still quite legible for those who can read: “One napkin at a time means better health.”

Get it?  Please remember it when I wipe my hands on the back of your shirt.

Carlton Fisher

No class at all.

 

Categories
Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor

Dear Editor,

I am writing about the new napkin arrangement in the cafeteria. Recently Sodexo has snatched away our napkin dispensers and replaced them with more centralized napkin holders. Students no longer have access to napkins while at their tables, and must leave their food and friends to venture out for a measly napkin. As a result many students have begun to “silently protest” the new arrangement by snagging as many napkins from the holders as possible – whether they use them or not. This has led to significant waste of napkins and time. Another issue that the new arrangement has made is students often forget to grab napkins for their meal and must make, yet another, trip to the food lines in order to grab them. The problem is aggravated by the smaller plates that cause food to spill off the edges. This has created another issue altogether – finding a table clean of scraps. It is a shame that the new napkin arrangement has overshadowed the recent good changes that Sodexo has made. My request for Sodexo is simple; please bring back the napkin dispensers.

Bradley Oliver

Class of ’15