Categories
Stories In Focus

Making Literature, Making Connections

This past February break, from March 2 to 4, Houghton students Sophia Ross ‘17 and Ava Bergen ‘17 presented at Taylor University’s Making Literature Conference. The conference, held every other year, invites undergraduates to submit fiction, poetry, and critical essays. If their work is accepted, students present in panels composed of three other students whose work resembles their own. This year’s conference drew students from Houghton, Hope College, Wheaton College, Taylor University, Anderson University, and several more schools. According to the conference’s official website, programming this year also included keynote academic speakers such as Tom Noyes (Houghton College alumni), Jessica Mesman Griffith, David Griffith, Grace Tiffany, Shari Wagner, and Amy Peterson, as well as a book fair hosted by Eighth Day Books.

Houghton students were made aware of the conference by Laurie Dashnau, professor of English. Houghton students have attended the conference in the past, but there was no trip planned to attend the conference this year. Even so, Dashnau invited students to submit papers. Bergen and Ross were informed of their acceptance in early February, and made travel plans accordingly so that they could attend.

Bergen, a double major in English and communication, presented her critical essay, “A Malleable Sense of Justice: Robin Hood’s Enduring Appeal to English Readers” and a collection of poems entitled “Transit.” In her essay, Bergen analyzes the use of Robin Hood as an English hero in different works over time. She researched his role in the texts “A Gest of Robyn Hoode” and the “Little Red Robin” by Vivian Matthews and Alick Manley, and argued that the character continued to be appealing to English readers due to his malleable sense of justice and military successes. She wrote the essay while studying at Oxford University in the Fall of 2016 as part of the Best Semester program. Her collection of poems, meanwhile, focus on the theme of “times of transition, times of uncertainty, and, above all, time spent in motion.”

Ross, a double major in English and writing, presented a fictional short story titled “Gone Places.” The piece takes place on a bus travelling through a snowstorm. There are only two passengers, and both are heading to a nursing home. One passenger is going to visit her dying grandmother and the other passenger is a nurse. The story centers on the relationship between the passenger and her grandmother, which Ross said is loosely based on her own relationship with her grandmother, who suffered from dementia during the last seven years of her life. Ross began the story during her sophomore year in Writing Fiction, a class taught by Lori Huth, assistant professor of creative writing. She came back to the work last semester and revised it for her graduate school applications.

While attending the conference meant working through half of their February break, both students agreed that it was worthwhile.

“I’m glad I attended,” said Ross. “This was my third time presenting at a conference as an undergraduate, which is fairly uncommon for students in the arts and humanities at Houghton. I’m very grateful for the opportunity to connect with students from other schools in my discipline, as well as professionals like Tom Noyes and Jessica Mesman Griffith.” She continued, “I always find it refreshing to see the context in which I’m working. It helps me remember that there is a big world of writers out there.”

Bergen, too, enjoyed the networking aspect of the conference as a source of inspiration.

“Having the opportunity to connect with writers and artists from other schools was wonderful,” she said. “There was also an encouraging underlying message from the pros: failure is inevitable. To be a writer is to entertain rejection. To persist, and continue writing, despite this is life-giving.”

Categories
Opinions

Keep Our Government Accountable

On Saturday, October 3rd, the US Government ordered an airstrike that inadvertently hit a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan. This hospital provided trauma care for Afghani victims of war. It is also one of the only medical centers left in this region of Afghanistan. In its response to this negligence, the Pentagon stated that “there may have been collateral damage to a nearby medical facility,” according to the New York Times. The hospital had released their GPS coordinates, prior to the strike, to all active parties in the region. How does this happen? At the highest levels of government, how can such flagrant “errors” occur, and why have we, as a nation, accepted the rationalization of ‘collateral damage’?

Emily FriesenRGBThis kind of thing has happened before and it will continue to happen as long as the public passively accepts the so-called “realities of warfare”. Reports about drones, airstrikes, and civilian casualties are so common, it is  hard to feel outraged anymore. In the news cycle, there is an unspoken rating scale for tragedies. There’s a VIP list of who was killed: “how many?” and “were any US citizens killed?” On such a scale, this incident in Kunduz falls pretty low.

To counter this kind of hierarchy, I won’t tell you how many people died, or their individual nationalities—our guilt and grief shouldn’t be tied to numbers—it belongs to the fact that a hospital was bombed and our government representatives basically said, “Oops.” Patients burned to death in their hospital beds. Innocent civilians seeking medical treatment should not have to fear hospital-bombings. The United States should not be paying lip-service to peacekeeping  while simultaneously hindering the work of international doctors who are giving their time and expertise to treat individuals with limited medical access. Days after the airstrike, Doctors Without Borders evacuated northern Afghanistan because of severely damaged facilities and staff casualties. Afghans from the Kunduz region will now have to travel hours to be treated.

I am by no means a journalist, so if you would like to know more about the airstrike, the New York Times has a number of informative articles on their website. Please read more about this!

Believe it or not, we are the voice of our government, and while our national attention has been focused on the election, this is what has actually been happening. I’m worried about the national election outcome; and (I think) like a lot of people, I follow the daily gaffes, comments, and pronouncements of both the Republican and Democratic candidates. I worry about who the future president might be, but this is just one office, of one branch of government. In comparison, so little of my time, thought, and outrage is given to the daily actions of the Pentagon, the top military officers, or the Department of Defense.

As citizens, we have the privilege and responsibility to stay informed and to speak out about all areas of government. Examine how you spend your political efficacy: Staying politically active is more than just voting. Keep our government accountable: email your state representatives and stay informed on international events. Through your political activity, force the presidential candidates to address these issues. As citizens of a democracy, we have intrinsic political power. When we don’t take action as citizens, I believe we are, in part, responsible for the consequences of our complacencies and indifferences. We have an obligation to ourselves, to our country, and the world to do more than just vote. Government decisions are made every day, every hour, that radically affect  the world—who could honestly believe that just voting once every four years makes a difference?