Categories
Opinions

Don’t Fear the Unknown

I have never been much of a details person. I prefer the unplanned: the wide-open opportunity of possibility, the space for surprise, and the room for wonder. I like the ticket, the destination, and a nodded, smiling, “yes.” I value openness, willingness, and flexibility. I value uncertainty. Is this the self-defensive anthem—a desperate, blind comfort—of a senior approaching graduation? Maybe—but maybe it is more than that. This, perhaps, may be considered as less of an expression of passivity, an aversion to commitment, and more of an active and intentional posturing. Its focus is on personhood, not plans. I’m packing light: my Nalgene is tucked and buckled into the side of my backpack and my passport and some cash are hidden in an inner pocket. The necessities are accounted for and the burden is light. I’m anticipating—I’m ready—to pick up and go, to nod a smiling “yes”, when God, when opportunity, says “Let’s go.”

RachelWoodworthWhen I arrived at Houghton, my smile was so wide, so expectant, that it was silly. I was buzzing, brimming, with curiosity.  I came with questions and expected to find answers; came with problems, confusions, and frustrations and I expected to find solutions. I said “yes” to opportunity after strange and sometimes serendipitous opportunity—“yes” to Journey’s End Tutoring, to Gospel Choir (though that was soon followed by a “no” when I realized my voice would be heard rather than smoothly and quietly blended with the others), to a One Missions Society (OMS) missions retreat in Indiana with a van full of strangers, to symposiums and Deacon Board meetings. Another “yes” took me to an Interfaith Conference in Kentucky where I was overwhelmed with newness, diversity, and strange, staggering, uncertainty. I spent an October break in the Adirondack Mountains and felt fantastically small, quiet, and happy: a feeling that would return in Tanzania through dwelling in the glory of the unfamiliar and the challenge of the context of close community. I marched through the streets of New York, calling for climate justice. My schedule and person have been full, to the brim and beyond, of new ideas, interactions, conversations, and questions—always questions.

My worldview, ambitions, values, and purpose have not compacted or narrowed focus in my four years at Houghton. No, they have been stretched, sometimes felt torn, into something much larger than I ever anticipated. The curious, but order seeking, freshman version of myself has faded and grown into something, someone, quite different.  My more black-and-white world has become gray, in the most beautiful sense. There is magic and mystery in the gray—in that misty blanket of fog. In this space, I’ve had to dismiss the comfort, safety, and satisfaction of the familiar. The gray settles over the similar, disguises the readily recognizable: I’ve learned to lean into the unknown, straining my eyes to see through and beyond the immediate and obvious. Here in the gray, my position is not clear. My placement does not yet have a title or a job description. I am in the here and not-quite-yet. Still gray, still fluid, is the Kingdom of God.

There is value in transience—in this uncertain limbo. This, maybe, is glorified indecisiveness. I’ve romanticized the “not knowing” and masked it as some grand adventure. Questions and uncertainty, though, have this inherent vulnerability. They are not secure. The territory they occupy is sometimes frightening, often in marked contrast to a savings-driven, career-oriented, fast-paced society. I take comfort in this: my tiny story is nested in a much larger narrative. There’s a bigger picture, a mosaic, divinely ordered. I see the scattered, lopsided pieces. I feel their wonky edges. I choose to remain faithful to the process, the working together of a divine vision, not panicked by the disorder.

My options are open and my plans are imperfect, uncertain. They may go awry—they already have. I think of miscalculated travel and a night spent in McDonalds. I think of an early morning in Tanzania, blundering through brush and darkness, losing and finding the path again, racing the rising of the sun. I remember hurrying to the top of the hill, struggling to catch my breath, and clambering on to a rock just as the sun was rising. There was God, peeking over the mountains, smiling, spilling light across the valley. We made it—we’ll make it.

Categories
Opinions

The Physicality of Beauty

In the last few years there has been a strong resistance against women portrayed in the media. People rightfully complain that women are sexualized and oppressed with an unrealistic standard of beauty and activists have aimed to instill realistic views of beauty and a higher self-esteem in young women. I fully affirm their intentions and it is important for people to have a healthy view of themselves and others, but the typical model used by such individuals may not be as helpful as they think.

Screen Shot 2014-11-20 at 3.14.26 PMWhen faced with mainstream views of beauty people often claim, “that these standards are unrealistic” (rightly so) and “that everybody is beautiful in their own way.” Fair enough—I completely agree. What I do not agree with is how these two ideas are then implemented in culture. The next step from individuals who are anti-media (as far as views of beauty in the strictly physical sense are concerned) is to affirm beautiful qualities in other people. These movements come in the form of “imperfectly perfect” tags or “#flawless,” where people affirm their “imperfections” and proclaim that they are valuable and beautiful in spite (and in some cases, because) of them.

These movements are not problematic because they motivate people to appreciate themselves, rather they are problematic because they affirm the concept that in some form or another, one’s physical appearance and how one feels about their physical appearance affects one’s value. A person in these forums may say something along the lines of, “I have scars on my knees #flawless.” What they really mean is that the physical scars on one’s knees may seem like a flaw, but really they are an asset to my perceived perfection or “flawless-ness.” This perfection does not refer to one’s physicality necessarily, but to one’s very being, their immateriality (personality) included. And may I say that although this is very romantic in nature, we cannot hold physical appearance so close to our value (even positively), because it is just not realistic. Sometimes we are ugly and that needs to be okay.

Ah. Ugly, it is such an “ugly” word. You probably cringed when I said it and if I called myself ugly you would run to my rescue affirming that it were not true. The question though is why? Probably because you are afraid that if I call myself “ugly,” then I will think of myself “less than” or “not equal to” others; and this is the notion that we need to kill if we want individuals with a strong self-concept. It is absolutely okay to not be beautiful, in the physical sense of the word. We need to have the self-confidence to admit that sometimes we are ugly (also in the physical sense of the word)When you’re playing sports, sleeping, crying, eating with your mouth open, wearing those plum pants, you might be ugly. That is fine. It is okay. Human beings are sometimes beautiful and sometimes gross, and there is nothing surreal about that fact.

If we want to raise young men and women who have strong self-esteem do not teach them to add transcendent notions of goodness to their arbitrary physical qualities. Because in all reality, one day their skin will wrinkle and their hair will go drab and all they will have to cling onto is the catchphrase that “they are beautiful, if only they choose to see it.” And in the romantic sense that might be true, but it is still an insufficient foundation to build one’s sense of worth. Instead teach them that some days they will be incredibly striking, and other days will be a little rough—but what they should put their faith in is not the physical attributes of their body, but the mind inside it. Because whether or not the corporeal image is attractive, the mind shall always be enticing. A person who knows that they themselves and those around them are valuable, both when they are physically striking and when they are rough around the edges is a person who has mastered the art of confidence and has shed off shallow notions of love.

Categories
Opinions

We’re Just Plain Scared to Be Wrong

In the last year, several important pieces of research have contributed to the idea that the Millennial Generation (that’s us) is full of contradictions and laden with confusion.

First and foremost, is a report from the Pew Research Center titled Millennials in Adulthood. The opening descriptions of the Millennial Generation are appropriately conflicting: “unattached…distrustful…but optimistic about the future.” The survey explains that while a record low 26% of people 18-32 are getting married, almost 42% of children born to this generation are born out of wedlock, and 58% of us believe that being a single parent is, “a bad thing for American society!” We are statistically more likely to engage in activities like hook-ups on Craigslist, couch surfing across Europe, and starting relationships at bars  – yet only 19% of Millennials think that most people can be trusted (the lowest of any generation). More than half of this generation identifies as politically independent though upwards of 65% vote blue. In addition to all of this, almost 30% of Millennials consider themselves free from religious fetters, clinging instead to some form of agnosticism, atheism, loosely defined spirituality, or nothing at all. For a generation repeatedly praised for its activist mindset, we lead the field in supporting gay marriage (68%), while appearing to care little for the environment (32%). How can there be so much confusion in a generation that is the most highly educated?

Wynn HortonAfter the report’s release, journalists and scholars had a field day predicting the impact of the “Confused Generation” upon the great American future. For the most part, these are highly negative – from prophecies regarding the downfall of the American political system to discussions of how mainstream religions might soon face their doom. Some, however, spouted positivity, rejoicing over the Democratic Party leanings of what will soon be the largest voting demographic or praising the “open-mindedness” of this intellectual generation. Christian magazines drafted entire issues discussing how to bring young adults back into the Church or start ministries targeted at the “lost.” We have inspired, in a word: chaos.

So where do Houghton students fit into this picture? Are we chaotic individuals filled with contradictions? For example, as Christian-liberal-arts students do we each have our own version of faith, highlighted by individualized heresies, just to make us more comfortable when we leave and go off into the world? Well – yes.

In the face of this conclusion I would present two responses: first, many of the Millennials’ contradictions stem from a fear of being wrong – a fear inspired by the idea that there is no objective truth. We are afraid of committing to a major because we “might be wrong.” We are afraid of committing to a relationship (much less a marriage) because “they might be wrong.” Graduating seniors are afraid to look for or commit to jobs – their career choice “might be wrong.” The examples are endless and the what-ifs are paralyzing. Secondly, this fear is coupled to a generation who, more than ever before, is more easily polarized by and controlled through informal peer pressure, or rather, the fear of being judged by our peers.

The leading cultural trends of the United States – which are determined in large part by a few powerful individuals and social media – are embraced by a generation hungry for someone else to define them.

Categories
Opinions Two Views

Two Views: On Climate Activism

In the mid-14th century, Italian officials and scientists became convinced that the paint in frescoes covering the inside walls of many churches was causing the Black Plague, then ravaging Europe. Desperate to “do something,” leaders ordered the frescoes whitewashed.

The Plague was unaffected, of course, but frescoes painted by great medieval artists, including Lorenzetti and Giotto di Bondone, were destroyed. Ironically, some masterpieces survived only because parishes couldn’t afford whitewash.

Z-photo2I thought of that futility when I read that Houghton students attended a New York City climate-rally. Environmentalists claim that human-produced CO2 is overheating Earth and altering the climate. Al Gore – who has made gazllions preaching Apocalypse – says the climate-science is “settled.” Some scientists agree; many others do not. 24/7 news coverage makes people think hurricanes, tornadoes and floods are worsening, but the data do not support this.

I lack credentials to judge climate science, but I know something about computational models. A career in simulation and modeling taught me that models are only as good as the mathematical representations and empirical data informing them. “Garbage in, garbage out” was our watchword. Experts admit that current models can’t correctly predict contemporary weather-patterns. Yet draconian government-policies, costing billions, are based on those models.

Renowned climate scientist James Lovelock recanted his earlier warnings, admitting his models were “primitive.” Judith Curry, president of the Climate Forecast Applications Network, wrote in the Wall Street Journal (Oct. 9, 2014) that the climate warming “hiatus,” since 1998, “…raises serious questions as to whether the climate-model projections of 21st century temperatures are fit for making public policy decisions.”

Climate-activism has been called a “new morality.” The NYC marchers believe they occupy that morality’s high ground, but do they realize they could be just as wrong as those long-ago whitewashers? And do they understand what their advocacy might cost the poorest of the world’s poor, as well as themselves?

This new climate-morality has a “dark side” – unknown to most Americans and seldom mentioned by mainstream media. President Obama disclosed it in his recent UN speech, when he asked poor countries to remain undeveloped to combat climate-change.

African delegates must have thought Mr. Obama mad. No sane politician wants his country to stay primitive and dirt-poor. Yet Western governments have agreed to block Third World development on alarmists’ tenuous predictions. This grotesque conspiracy should arouse every Christian’s indignation.

Worldwide, 2 billion people lack reliable electricity. Most cook and heat with smoky, open fires, burning wood or dung. In these unhealthy environments, 4 million children a year die from respiratory ailments. There is no electricity for lights, hot water, refrigeration, heat, or cooling. Industrial development is impossible. The modernity Americans expect simply doesn’t exist.

One African official said, “The West cannot imagine how hard life is without electricity.” He bitterly denounced “romanticizing” primitive African existence that no westerners (including students!) would tolerate. It’s racism at its ugliest, most degenerate level – truly, a cause to march for. But is it even mentioned on college campuses?

Africa’s vast energy resources could enrich the continent and improve its people’s lives: oil reserves of 975 billion barrels (a 100-year world-supply); 484 trillion cubic feet of natural gas; incalculable coal reserves. Western engineers and technicians could develop Africa’s resources and industry, making it an emerging powerhouse. Its potential is virtually unlimited.

Environmentalists and western politicians want Africa limited to solar panels and windmills, although electricity so generated is unreliable and three times as expensive as from coal-fired plants. Rich countries can afford to experiment, observed the above-mentioned official, while poor countries must use the most expensive, inefficient forms of power-generation. He added:

The African dream is to develop. You might power a light bulb with a solar panel, but you can’t run steel mills and factories with power generated that way.”

European leaders want Africa kept primitive because they fear the economic threat that Africa’s huge resources and 800 million nutrition-and-work-starved people represent to Europe’s declining populations and stagnant economies. Economic Imperialism is the Climate movement’s really dirty secret.

Fundamentally, the Green movement is anti-human. Its strategists consider people “the problem.” Their vision is a green, non-industrial Earth – sparsely populated by hunters, gatherers, and hand-tillers of the soil. One doubts that stock-brokers, car salesmen, bankers, doctors, lawyers, or politicians will be among them.

Ordinary citizens consider the movement benign – like pollution-cleanup. Green is hip. Businesses cheerfully offer to “save the planet” by eliminating paper bags and charging extra for plastic. The danger is great because the movement’s true aims are concealed.

Climate politics seem invincible. Opposition is stomped or ignored. Both political parties ride the Climate Bandwagon. The US Environmental Protection Agency regulations will destroy the coal industry, send fuel and electricity rates soaring, cripple the American economy and impoverish our most vulnerable citizens. It’s a politician’s dream-issue because its effectiveness (or not) won’t be discernible for 100 years.

Mr. Obama promises more “aid” for desperate Third World countries. But we should be spending any available bucks to help those nations develop – not waste it on foolish attempts to affect the climate that will do nothing except burn up precious funds.

If primitive Africa is ever going to escape squalor, disease and hunger, it must use every available resource. Windmills, solar panels, dirt-floor huts, rats running around, and smoky fires burning buffalo crap won’t do it. I’m ashamed that we’re involved in crippling Third World development. I urge Houghton students to view all aspects of the climate issue with a very critical eye.

Follow the money.

-Woody Zimmerman

Woody is a ’64 Houghton Alumnus.

 

Categories
Opinions Two Views

Two Views: On Climate Activism

I hear it all the time, and I couldn’t agree more; “Don’t listen to the alarmists!”  The world is full of people on both the right and the left spouting endless claims about global warming—claims loaded with assertions but too often devoid of facts.

Fortunately, the scientific community offers a clear and consistent picture that helps us cut through the rhetoric and get straight to the data.  Last year the non-partisan, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a 1,500-page report assessing our knowledge of the global climate system based on more than 30,000 peer-reviewed publications.  More than 600 of the world’s top climate experts representing 39 countries contributed to the report.  Their conclusions were explicit, referring to global warming as “unequivocal” and stating that the “human influence on the climate system is clear.”

Indeed, no fewer than 97% of climate scientists agree with this assessment–along with every major national and international scientific association. The simple truth is that the overwhelming weight of the scientific evidence points toward one inescapable conclusion—burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases, which warm the planet. In other words, the world is warming; humans are causing it; and it’s leading to serious consequences. Perhaps it’s time to move past the so-called “debate” about global warming’s existence and instead ask ourselves, “Why does it matter?”

AnthonyBurdo_BrianWebbDuring the past 100 years, the world has warmed by about 1° Celsius. While this may not seem like much, we can already measure the impacts from this seemingly small change in the form of rising seas, more heat waves, changes in precipitation patterns, species migration, ocean acidification, and more intense storms. If current levels of fossil fuel consumption continue scientists warn that we can expect to see a further 3° – 5° C rise this century, and that problems will get much worse.

Importantly, such changes don’t occur in isolation, but have direct humanitarian and economic costs on the global human population. Decreased global food production, increased conflict, spreading disease vectors, water insecurity, more natural disasters, and mass human displacement will each become increasingly common as the world attempts to cope with unprecedented climatic changes. Sea level rise alone will permanently displace 20 million Bangladeshis and inundate entire island countries.

Unfortunately, the brunt of this impact will fall on the poor in developing countries—those least able to cope with such changes. This is where climate change becomes a social justice issue. Those hurt the most by a changing climate are the ones who have done the least to cause it. Meanwhile, those of us responsible for the bulk of greenhouse gas emissions (industrialized countries) are fortunate to be located where climate impacts won’t be felt quite as acutely.

We have unwittingly become party to the most widespread social injustice in human history—one that literally impacts every human on the planet. The question is, “what will we do about it?”

Many claim that climate mitigation is just too expensive, though nothing could be further from the truth. Not only do climate mitigation policies generate jobs through new industries and infrastructure, but they also reduce costs in the areas of health care, disaster cleanup, energy demand, pollution abatement, refugee resettlement, etc. The reality is that the cost of inaction will far exceed the cost of acting quickly to avert the worst impacts of climate change.

Some well-meaning, but deeply misinformed, individuals claim that climate action will actually hurt the poor. The truth is that no one has more to gain from climate action than the poor, who already suffer on the front lines of climate change and are literally begging industrialized nations to slow down their carbon emissions. One Bangladeshi man was recently quoted as saying, “Forget about making poverty history. Climate change will make poverty permanent.” As a Christian eager to fulfill Jesus’ second greatest commandment this statement from a development expert in one of the world’s poorest countries concerns me.

Should a Christian get involved in climate action? You’ll have to answer that for yourself, but first I suggest you ask the Malawian farmers who no longer know when to plant their crops because the rainy seasons have changed. Or residents of the Maldives who are developing a national evacuation plan to escape the rising seas. Or the families that lost their homes in Superstorm Sandy. Or the California farmers who can’t grow crops because of the epic drought. Or the Native Americans of Shishmaref, Alaska, whose homeland is rapidly eroding into the rising ocean.

As for me, I choose to believe the word of those who have devoted their careers to studying the global climate system over those who talk about it on their blogs. And I choose to stand with those who are suffering. What will you do?

-Brian Webb

Brian is the Sustainability coordinator and the intercultural student programs coordinator.

Categories
Opinions

Speaking: a Spiritually Formative Practice

There are many voices calling out to us everyday, be it the Church, our parents, our teachers, or our friends. Each voice that we allow to impact us, has the potential to be formative, to create us into whom he or she, they or it wants us to be. If one of the voices is of greater significance than the rest, the potential of being formative is increased. With greater significance comes greater power. With greater power comes great danger. The potential of abusing the power to be formative in the lives of those around us is increased provided the avenue into the person’s life remains open.

Hope SchwartzThere have been many different people, experiences, and institutions that have been formative in my life. The morals and values I was raised up with in my family, my faith tradition, and my network of friends have played a role in creating me into who I am today. There have been those who have not abused the power to form who I am, but then there are also those who have abused their power to contribute to my formation. Sexual abuse and destructive relationships have also contributed to my formation. In those relationships, I was not given the freedom to speak.

Recent chapel speaker Sheridan Voysey spoke about his journey through the wilderness. He said that the wilderness is a place of revelation, a place of discovery, and a place of transition. I felt a deep peace as he offered a different view on time spent in the wilderness. I have been in the wilderness for some time now, and I always felt the guilt of ending up here. I felt an urge to leave as quickly as possible, for the shame that typically follows when others find out. But now my perspective has changed. I am not ashamed of the wilderness. This time in the wilderness has been revealed as a time of formation. I am discovering new formative practices. These practices are meant to make me into a new person. One of the new formative practices I discovered is speaking. God has given me the freedom to speak.

So what does speaking as a formative practice look like? Speaking is a practice that can take many forms. One can speak through spoken words, writing, body language, sign language, art, poetry, journaling, and prayer among others.

The Bible can be our guide in learning how one should use the formative behavior of speaking. The Bible commands us to be slow to speak, quick to listen, and slow to get angry. Speaking and listening are practices that are linked together. This passage suggests that if a person doesn’t listen, he or she may get angry, and choose to speak too harshly, or say something that he or she will regret. It is within our control to think before we speak.

Additionally, the Bible encourages us to speak truthfully and speak words of edification to others. I wonder what it would look like if I chose to have nothing negative to say about the people in my life, but only chose to say words of edification. Edification isn’t simply the absence of negative word; it is choosing to use words that will encourage growth.

Speaking is a gift. Speaking grants us the ability to worship and praise God through spoken, unspoken, and written words. With my voice, I can call out injustice, and speak truth into the lives of those around me. Learning how to speak is my attempt at nurturing and using this gift wisely.

I want to encourage all of you to discover what has been formative in your life.  Are there specific people that have influenced you more than others? Is there one specific Bible verse that has been formative in your life? Are there negative experiences in your life that have formed you? I want to encourage you to spend some time in reflection and maybe try some new formative practices. You don’t have to be in the wilderness in order to be in a place of revelation, discovery, and transition!

Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor

Dear Editor,

I have observed two areas which are rapidly undermining our culture. First, people do not believe the authority of the Bible. Second, God’s intention for marriage has been lost.

Heb. 4:12 refers to the Bible as living and active. God’s Word never changes. Scripture teaches that God has authority over the physical and spiritual. Scripture is given by God to show us how to live for Him (2 Tim. 3:16-17; 2 Pet. 1:19-21). Unfortunately, our culture views the Bible as irrelevant.

Recent editorials in the Star supported homosexuality without any mention Scripture. Some church leaders were quoted who support homosexuality, but the Bible gives examples of spiritual leaders who knowingly denied the truth of Scripture, contrary to God’s Word.

The author said there are “misunderstood Bible passages on homosexuality” but gave no references to support this view. She reasons that, “two men or two women simply falling in love does not compute as sin for me.” Any sex outside of marriage is sin as is homosexuality (Rom. 1:18-32; 1 Thes. 4:1-8).

God’s intention for marriage is being destroyed. Marriage is an institution created by God (Gen. 2:24) which Jesus confirms in Matt. 19:4-6. God’s idea of marriage is for a male and a female to be united in one flesh, never to be separated. This relationship is to be sexually and spiritually pure.

Pluralism forces us to accept anyone’s beliefs. This leads to chaos. As Judges 21:25 states, “every man did that which was right in his own eyes.”

May God help us follow Him through His Word.

Sincerely in Christ,

Dr. James Szymanski

Categories
Letter to the Editor Opinions

Letter to the Editor

Dear Editor of the Star,

Holly Chaisson’s editorial in in the October 24 issue of the Star, “Homosexuals and the Church” provides a problematic and inaccurate characterization of the Catholic Church’s recent deliberations regarding homosexuality.

Ms. Chaisson introduces her piece with a number of remarks–taken mostly from the BBC and bearing little resemblance to the documents of the synod or the words of Pope Francis–on the recently concluded Synod of Bishops on the Family. In speaking of the Relatio, the “midway report” of the synod, which mentioned the “gifts” homosexuals had to offer the Church, she writes, “The fact that this was the early language approved by Pope Francis speaks volumes.” This is misleading. The document’s purpose was to give a report on the synod’s discussions: we have no way of knowing whether the Pope approved of those discussions. Furthermore, the section on homosexuality was written by Archbishop Bruno Forte, known for his progressive theology. Some cardinals suggested that the Relatio did not accurately reflect the discussions that had taken place, and several expressed surprise that it had been published at all.

Ms. Chaisson later states, “Disappointed by the decision of the synod, Pope Francis insisted upon full transparency of all document drafts and voting tally. In the same BBC press statement, Francis is quoted as cautioning against ‘hostile inflexibility, that is, wanting to close oneself within the written word, and not allowing oneself to be surprised by God.'” A request for transparency need not imply disappointment. If Pope Francis was disappointed, it may well have been because of attempts to change the Church’s position. He did indeed caution against “hostile inflexibility,” but he actually offered more condemnations of progressives than conservatives. For example, he warned against the “temptation to a destructive tendency to goodness, that. . . binds the wounds without first curing them and treating them. . . .  It is the temptation . . . of the so-called ‘progressives and liberals.'” To conclude from the Pope’s statements that he was “disappointed” is unreasonable.

-Jonathan Meilaender

Categories
Opinions

Enrollment and The Hail Mary Pass

A Vanderbilt University study concluded colleges that had recently closed had enrollments of fewer than one thousand students and endowments of under $50 million. Many were religious institutions such as Bethany University in California. First year student enrollment drastically dropped – by 10% or more –  at more than a quarter of U.S. private four-year colleges over the past two years, according to the Wall Street Journal. Higher education experts foresee a death spiral for small private schools due to an overreliance on tuition revenue and a scarcity of large endowments.

JFGVHoughton College has been affected by low enrollment over the past several years. Last year, Houghton missed their enrollment target and the administration enacted austerity measures such as staff layoffs, closing of floors in dorms, and cutbacks to underperforming academic and sports programs. Houghton has survived more than a century of wars, depressions, and social changes. The problems faced today are found within rapidly changing local and national demographics. As Western New York loses 1% of its population every two years and families move south, the possibility of a vibrant local enrollment diminishes. In addition, our winters make Houghton a tough sell to out-of-state students.

The national numbers are even more implacable. As high school graduating class size declines, those who graduate are deciding in larger numbers not to attend college. Private liberal arts schools continue to be dominated by white, female students. At open access colleges, which accept at least 80% of applicants, enrollment for African-Americans and Hispanics doubled in the past decade.

Religion in America is also changing, according to Pew Research. In 1955, our country was composed of 70% mainline Protestant faiths. Today, Protestants account for 50%. Catholics and non-denominational Christians are now up to 36%.  Houghton College and Dean Michael Jordan have been very accepting of all Christian faiths, but Houghton should include our Christian diversity more when promoting the school.

The dawn of online education also hurts enrollment. According to a Babson College survey, 32% of students nationally had enrolled in an online course. To add fuel to the fire, many liberal arts schools have simply priced themselves out of the market. Tuition costs have risen beyond the inflation rate and the ability to find a job to pay off debt has severely diminished due to a poor job environment.

Every problem has solutions and Houghton has responded with many positive initiatives to assist in this year’s enrollment, which is up 10%, or about thirty students, from last year’s numbers.  The increase can be attributed to an agreement with Indiana Wesleyan to launch Houghton education online, a newly opened associate’s degree program in Buffalo, the Loan Repayment Assistance Program, and an increased effort to attract foreign students in Hong Kong. These endeavors have moved the football down the field a few yards, but more students can be added at a low cost. Houghton would score a touchdown by using its best asset.

Through a generous gift by the Kerr-Pegula family, we have trumped nearly every college in the Northeast with our athletic facilities. Houghton has also spent a lot of money to complete the project. There has been a growing population of students who play sports at Houghton. According to Skip Lord, Houghton’s Athletic Director, 25% of students participate in athletics, with a goal of a 33%. The ratio is excellent, but consider elite academic schools such as Haverford College and Williams College with nearly 40% of their students playing varsity sports. Athletics attract students to come to campus, stay on campus, take up residence, and buy Houghton sports themed apparel. Our teams recruit players at camps and give Houghton visibility. Houghton athletes establish recruiting pipelines from their former high schools. Coaches have a distinct advantage of selling the college over an admissions officer as athletes and their parents are easily swayed by the opportunity to play at the next level.

Recently, the addition of several new sports has helped enrollment. Of those additions, baseball has been the biggest success adding more than 30 students. Coach Brian Reitnour has recruited students from Colorado, Washington, New Jersey, Tennessee, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Canada and British Guyana. We could add more students by relaunching low-cost, official JV teams. Sports like soccer and baseball are ripe for JV programs and could add 50 students. Houghton is well known for its equestrian studies and runs one of best equestrian summer camps. Could not Houghton mirror the program and competition schedule of Centenary College of New Jersey, which packs ninety students on the equestrian team?

However, the enrollment touchdown pass for a small college is to add a football team with a promise of over one hundred new, paying students. Since 2009, over 40 new college football programs have been added. Many programs have helped small private schools such as Hendrix College reverse the enrollment death spiral. Seton Hill also found enrollment in football. The school’s president noted to The New York Times, “I could have started a spiffy new major of study, spent a lot of money on lab equipment and hired a few new high-powered professors; I might have gotten 25 more students for that. Instead, I started a football team, brought in hundreds of paying students, added a vibrant piece to our campus life and broadened our recognition factor.” College football is a game changer for small schools. Besides just boosting enrollment it can eliminate low male ratios and attract new Christian minorities and ethnic, Catholic students that might not consider Houghton. Football can also add a 25 person cheerleader squad and a 60 student marching band to our vibrant music community.

In sum, Houghton doesn’t have to be a small school casualty. We must acknowledge that demographic shifts and technological changes are moving rapidly and are beyond our control. With our athletic facilities, Houghton College has distinct advantage to reverse a national trend. How we react and adapt to those trends will be how our future is determined.

 

Categories
Opinions

Yik Yak: Why I Keep It

“You know what Twitter needs? Less accountability. That will improve things.” This posted on Yik Yak by an anonymous poster using the pseudonym “Dean Michael Jordan.”

These days, social networks seem to be springing out of the digital woodwork. Every web developer and app designer is trying to find the niche that is as-yet untouched. Some new social networks stick around well. Others do not. Eventually, most fade in popularity, becoming replaced with others that do the same thing, only better.

michaelYik Yak is an app that has, so far, stuck around. For those unfamiliar with the name, allow me to explain. Yik Yak is a smartphone application that allows its users to post a short amount of text (200 characters or less), much like many other social networks. The main difference between Yik Yak and similar networks is its addition of anonymity. Those who post (“yak”) to the app are completely anonymous, their words being presented without credit given to anyone. If a user so chooses, they can adopt a pseudonym to post under. However, anyone can adopt each other’s pseudonyms or change names at any time, and so no true identity is revealed.

Without any sort of identification, Yik Yak needs another way to connect its users. It chooses proximity. Users see posts from people who are using the app nearby. Readers can then vote yaks up or down, helping them reach a status of popularity, or deleting them from the feed with an overwhelming negative vote. It is also possible to reply to yaks, and to have a conversation in this way. The result for those of us who live in Houghton is a feed of thoughts, feelings, jokes, and complaints written and tailored by Houghton students, for Houghton students. And sorry for this disillusionment, but if you look through our feed, you might not like what you find.

When a given semester ends, students are afforded the opportunity to give anonymous feedback about their professors. I know I am not the only one who takes this opportunity to let out the feelings, good and bad, that I keep to myself throughout the semester. Yik Yak is a lot like these reviews. The danger comes from the pressure to write popular yaks. The Houghton feed brings up many more negative comments than I hear around campus, simply because – let’s face it – we can all agree on what we dislike about Houghton. You’ve heard it all before: the food is bad, college is hard, sleep is rare, and… people break the community covenant?

MichaelCarpenterYes, it’s true, and it’s upsetting. We have a “dark side.” I have seen posts on Yik Yak about things ranging from sexual frustration (no!), to seeking someone who will sell drugs (never!), to a recent, “Houghton, what is your favorite beer?” These are sad and, for some, shocking expressions of a group of college students who, hello, came to a Christian college. Where did they learn this evil, and why are they here?

Well, at least “they” are honest about it. That might seem like a small comfort, but I mean it. These things are real, and actually happen on a regular basis. If we never talk about, for example, sex, drugs, alcohol, or how and why we are hurting, there can never be solutions to these issues. Yik Yak has created a safe space to express it all honestly. Now, let’s not confuse honesty with accuracy or authenticity. Yik Yak is NOT a perfect representation of who we are. It’s biased toward those who use smartphones, desire a place for anonymous communication, and aren’t overly frustrated with what they read. But it is entirely made up of Houghton residents. No one else is posting in the Houghton feed. They can’t.

So, then, what is the best response? Well, I’m going to keep my Yik Yak. I keep it because I don’t need to hide from mere words, especially words that give me a greater understanding of those around me, and how to love them. And I know that I am salt and light (for the Bible tells me so), so I’m going to act like it. Our feed could always use a bit more positivity and a bit more love. Of course, Yik Yak is not my mission field, and needn’t be yours, either. Most Houghton students are Christian already, and Yik Yak does not allow enough personal connection to evangelize. But I won’t be posting anything that I wouldn’t be proud to own up to. You shouldn’t either.