Categories
Opinions

The Hunger for Violence

Over Thanksgiving break I went to see the third movie of The Hunger Games series, of which I have read all three books. Since then, multiple people have asked me if I liked it, and each time I have had trouble answering. Did I like it? I don’t think so; but I don’t think this series was meant to be enjoyed.

CoryBrautigamIt’s not that the cinematography was bad or the acting was poor, but it’s disturbing to see the parallels between the dystopian society imagined by the author of The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins, and the world we live in. And surely this is, at least in part, the point of the series. However, what’s more disturbing is the number of people I hear talking about how much they like the series. I’m not saying that it’s necessarily wrong for someone to like it, but we need to at least understand that it is more than entertainment. It is revelatory.

If you’re not convinced this is true, look to Thailand. Following the military coup in May, people began to use the three-fingered salute from The Hunger Games as an act of resistance to the new military-run government. This led to multiple arrests. People living in the systems of our world can relate to this story of a totalitarian empire that sends children into the “Hunger Games” where only one can come out victorious, only one survives — these games held to display government power. This is scary.

There are many disheartening parallels to be found between the nation of Panem in The Hunger Games, the nation we live in, and all the powers and principalities of this world. But this is not the only evil exposed by this series. Though, it is the easiest to see. In fact, the larger wrongdoing revealed, the one I think we would do good to uncover, may be the very reason that it is easiest to see the evil of the government.

So what is this subtle evil? Violence. The will of the crowd. The most disturbing part of reading this series was witnessing my own passion to bring about justice by the way of violence catch fire, so to speak.

13150546874_b3f7296522_bLet me say that I am thankful to be an American. However, I was ready to throw the first stone at my nation upon reading these books, but I am now realizing that, sadly, I have both benefited from the brokenness of the system and contributed to it. I certainly have no right to violence; and as Brian Zhand points out in his book A Farewell to Mars, we often think this is what freedom is: a right to violence. He goes on in this book to say that “violence cannot tolerate the presence of one who owes it nothing.” This is a hard truth. We either put ourselves at risk of being stoned or we join in the stoning. No other options exist.

In The Hunger Games, the resistance to the government is formed behind the image of a warrior, a victor, a “courageous” killer, Katniss Everdeen and her three-finger salute. This symbol brings the people of Panem together against the Capitol. The Jews would have much preferred Katniss Everdeen riding in her flaming chariot to Jesus riding on a donkey. Surely, they would not have killed her.

In the series, you see Katniss struggling with the symbol she has become. She is unsure of whether she should continue in her role as the incarnate representation of this resistance movement. In some ways she wants to be more like Jesus and his way of peace. Yet, she cannot overcome the need the mass has for her as a symbol of retaliation, and the systemic “necessitation” of violence.

As Christians we have a different symbol to unite behind, the only symbol that can unite people in peace. That is Jesus Christ, the Prince of Peace. Through his death on the cross he has exposed the inherent evil of the violent systems of the world, the systems that put him on the cross. I think, if we are attentive to the revelatory nature of The Hunger Games series, we might be able to see how they also shine light on these evils. May we not worry about whether the odds are ever in our favor, but instead always choose to follow Christ down the path of peace and peacemaking.

Categories
Stories In Focus

Solanas’ Upside Down Wows with Cinematography, Ultimately Disappoints

Last week was a medium-to-heavy stressful haze of completing one project only to realize that I had another due. My roommate and I decided it was high time we just give up and find a potentially emotionally taxing movie to watch in order to have an excuse for the release of our tears of desperation. We settled on Upside Down, a 2012 release written and directed by Juan Solanas. We chose Upside Down for a two reasons. First, because of its stars. The movie features Jim Sturgess of Across the Universe and 21 fame, and Kirsten Dunst, who is quite possibly my most favorite actress. Our second reason was the intriguing premise.

Courtesy of impawards.com
Courtesy of impawards.com

Solanas crafted a world in which two planets rotate together mere yards apart, each with their own separate gravity. Matter from one planet maintains its own gravity on the other planet, thus making it impossible for humans to walk on the opposite planet. The planets are connected by a skyscraper housing TransWorld, a company that governs interplanetary contact and commerce. “Up Above” is the affluent planet. “Down Below” is the impoverished planet. As my roommate put it, “This is a very obvious metaphor for the Global North and South.”

As you might expect, Sturgess and Dunst play Adam and Eden, citizens of Down Below and Up Above, respectively, who meet by chance on twin mountaintops and fall in love. And so unfolds a classic forbidden love story, following the struggles of two people separated by class, distance, and in this case, gravity.

For the first half of the movie, all was well. The dual worlds kept the otherwise mundane plotline interesting. The cinematography was beyond stunning. Picture for yourself the possibilities: simultaneous sunsets and sunrises, mirrored horizons, the stark and beautiful contrasts between the gleaming Above and the ashen Below. All of these images and more were fantastically represented in this imaginative landscape. It was truly stunning to watch. The score, too, was amazing. Instrumentals by a variety of composers accompanied the cinematography. It was almost enough to watch the movie just for those two elements. Almost.

Unfortunately, as the movie progressed, several faults became more and more obvious. Dunst’s considerable talents were wasted in a role that reduced her to little more than the damsel in distress. Eden’s scenes were short and all but one or two were merely flirtatious conversations with Adam. Sturgess plays a lovably optimistic Adam, however, who was the main focus: a visionary inventor blindly using his skills to pursue the ever-elusive Eden rather than to improve the standard of living in his police-state planet.

Various plot holes grew and grew until they basically bottomed out during the clearly rushed conclusion. It’s not too much of a spoiler to say that somehow, miraculously, the star-crossed lovers are finally brought together through an unexplained turn of events. The film concludes with glossy pans of an economically balanced future, with children from both Above and Below happily playing together on the same plane. This change is apparently sparked by the romance between Adam and Eden, although the hows and whys of it are never delved into.

Overall, Upside Down would have worked much better as a short story rather than a feature-length film. While I give the actors involved props for making their performances memorable even with limited material, I don’t suggest watching this film unless you are just really, really, really into cinematography.

 

Categories
Arts

Annual Film Festival

The annual Film Festival is on Friday, April 12 this year, a night for Houghton’s amateur filmmakers to showcase their current creative endeavors. The first event of the evening, a formal event, will first feature a “Blue-Hue” pre-party that will be hosted at 8 p.m. in the Van Dyk lounge.

arts&sports_filmfestThe competition, following the pre-party, will take place in Wesley Chapel promptly at 9 p.m. As in any competition, the judging and awards will follow the screenings. Categories this year range from animation and comedy to commercial and drama. According to one of the judges in the competition, Sally Murphy, points are awarded according to different elements of the films such as acting, directing, and cinematography.

The awards are given for achievements such as best actor or actress, best cinematography, best editing, and of course, best picture. The competitive nature of the festival aside, contestant Aaron Fitzgerald, senior, regards it as an opportunity to “celebrate the work of filmmakers on campus.” Cory Martin, junior, said that the purpose of the festival is a chance for students to proudly “display their art to the public.”

Expectations are high for this year’s turnout. “In the past, the Houghton Film Festival has been a big letdown for me. The content was not good. It did not provide a good context to show something you had worked hard on. It was a popularity contest,” said Fitzgerald. “On further inspection, the quality of work and the attitudes of the people submitting films this year seems to be a much higher level and I am happy that I submitted something.”

Submissions this year range from the serious to the comical; “some are stupid and make you scratch your head and laugh, and others are on a more serious note,” senior contestant Andrew Jones said. From an animation film based on a Richard Simmons’ dance video submitted by Martin, to a short film-poem that adapts Ulysses by Tennyson entered by Fitzgerald, this year’s entries are sure to both entertain and encourage thought-provoking dialogue for filmmakers and attendees alike.

This evening would not be possible, of course, without the interest of Houghton students in the art of filmmaking. Jones is looking forward to the Festival as an opportunity to showcase his videos on a larger scale than the in-class critique. Jones said, “Video is such a big part of our culture and it’s great when I can contribute my own ideas and stories. I just enjoy telling stories through film, and much like writing, acting, singing, or painting, film is just another way you can tell a story in an engaging and entertaining way.”

Senior Nicholas Quigley said, “I wanted to submit my piece to share with my friends what I actually do as a communication major.” His entry, Visions, is a submission in the Drama category; he said that his piece “is an ambiguous piece that takes you on a journey in and out of this guy’s head as he deals with his darkest time in his life. What I love about the piece is its ambiguity that leaves the viewer open to interpreting it as they want.”

This year’s Film Festival is a celebration of film that offers a chance to view some fantastic amateur films by fellow students. Murphy said that it is an opportunity to “feel a little Hollywood glam,” making this an event that students will not want to miss.