Categories
International News

Mass Death Sentence in Egypt

An Egyptian court on Monday, February 1st 2015, sentenced 183 Muslim Brotherhood supporters to death. The court proceedings were held over the killing of 11 police officers in the violence that had engulfed Egypt after the 2013 dismissal of the former Islamist president, President Mohammed Morsi.

The attack took place after Egyptian military forces cracked down on Islamist supporters of Morsi in July 2013. Egyptian security forces descended onto two pro-Morsi camps in July and August 2013, killing hundreds.

JoePoyfairAt the end of July and beginning of August 2013, hundreds of demonstrators were killed by Egyptian security forces. The Human Rights Watch said that this mass killing of protesters “probably amounts to crimes against humanity,” thus creating an international outcry that was quickly quieted by the Egyptian government.

The United Nations has called the trials “unprecedented.” Amnesty International’s Deputy Middle East and North Africa Program Director, Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, said in a statement in response to Monday’s verdict.  “The death sentences are yet another example of the bias of the Egyptian criminal justice system.”

Sahraoui further stated that “issuing mass death sentences whenever the case involves the killing of police officers now appears to be near-routine policy, regardless of facts and with no attempt to establish individual responsibility.”

The original trial saw 377 people sentenced to life in prison in absentia, while not present at the event being referred to.  Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui said it would be wrong to impose the capital punishment “when there are serious doubts hanging over the fairness of the trial which disregarded international law.”

The Egyptian court did not put 183 individuals to death lightly. The Egyptian government has been attempting to fight against terrorism in Egypt. Muslim extremism has seen an increase in central Egypt in the past decade, and President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has been fighting against these extremists.

Egypt’s current government, led by President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, has called for a ‘religious revolution’ and asked Muslim leaders to help in the fight against extremism. President el-Sisi has launched a war against terrorism, focusing particularly on the countries Sinai region, where an extremist group recently pledged allegiance to ISIS.

In an act of counter extremism, Egyptian authorities cracked down in 2013 on former supporters of Morsi, a longtime member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which the Egyptian government had officially declared a terrorist organization in December 2013

In a speech on New Year’s Day, President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi called for a “religious revolution” in Islam that would displace violent jihad from the center of Muslim discourse. “Is it possible that 1.6 billion people should want to kill the rest of the world’s population, [which] is 7 billion people, so that they themselves may live?” President el-Sisi asked.

“We have to think hard about what we are facing,” President el-Sisi said. “It’s inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire Islamic world to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing, and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible.”

Categories
News

National // Riots in Ferguson Cause Unrest

On what many thought was an ordinary August day, within a suburb outside of St. Louis, in Ferguson MO, a not so ordinary incident occurred. Michael Brown an unarmed African American 18 year-old was shot and killed by a white police officer, Brian Wilson. The event initiated violent riots and protests throughout the country, which have continued and only heightened after the grand jury made their final decision. The account of the event has varied. However reliable sources state Brown fled from a Market and Liquor store where he and one other person stole cigarillos, a type of cigar.

A block away, Officer Wilson met him on the street. Wilson then proceeded to stop the men, calling them from his S.U.V.  A quarrel erupted between the two, where some witnesses say Brown attempted to grab the officer’s gun. Two shots were fired, missing and/or grazing the teenager. The officer supposedly proceeded to chase the suspect. Brown then turned and began to run towards the officer who fired several more shots. A majority of the evidence collected appears to support this testimony, investigators say.
The grand jury, made up of 9 whites and 3 blacks, was responsible for determining whether or not there was a probable cause to indict Officer Wilson with crime. A New York Times article reported the recently published transcripts, forensic and photographic evidence by the county prosecutor, which is traditionally kept clandestinely away from the public.

The Ferguson case is arguably unique and intricate in more than one way. First, typical court cases are usually presented to a jury within one day whereas the grand jury in the Ferguson case met over a span of 25 days within a 3 month period. Secondly, the grand jury received testimonies of the incident from over 60 witnesses. A jury will usually see only two to three witnesses per case. Thirdly, a jury doesn’t usually hear from the defendant themselves, however Officer Wilson’s testified for 4 hours. Fourthly, a prosecutor generally offers a range of specific charges, which a grand jury may base their indictment on. In the Ferguson case, Robert P. McCulloch, the county prosecutor, did not recommend any charges against Wilson. Lastly, under Missouri Law, all evidence and related material is kept secret within the courtroom, and may be submitted at a later trial. Not so here, McCulloch released all documents following the grand jury’s decision not to indict Officer Wilson.

However, the case doesn’t end here. Two investigations are underway. A civil rights inquiry was opened up by the F.B.I., involving the shootings that took place on August 11. The other civil rights investigation was opened by the Justice Department, who has begun to examine whether the policy in Ferguson have a historical background of discrimination and exploitation of force. The death of Michael Brown sparked numerous protests and riots for weeks. Buildings were set on fire and raids on business were reported. Police were forced to respond with tear gas and rubber bullets. Governor Jay Nixon deployed the state’s National Guard to curb the violent responses prior and post the jury’s decision.

KatharineLabrecqueRecently President Obama responded to the uprisings following the grand jury’s decision, suggesting this case represents “the broader challenges we still face as a nation,” involving discrimination. Furthermore, the President responded to accusations of racism in Ferguson as a result of the “legacy of racial discrimination in this country.”  These statements reflect the facts that Ferguson County consists predominantly of black communities.

Nearly the entire police force in Ferguson consists of white males, with the exception of four blacks. This ratio reflects a historical trend ‘white flight’ in many American cities over the last few decades. As many white families moved out to the suburbs, black families have moved into the suburbs. However, the large number of white officers may reflect the nature of job placement or historical relationships and ties to the community.

As riots and protests are breaking out around the country, people are wondering what will happen next. The death of Michael Brown has raised questions about the relationship between black communities and law enforcement. Perhaps the case reiterates the demand for our nation to address our criminal justice system. However, without a doubt in terms of dispensing true justice, many contend our system is the best in the world. “But, like every facet of the American democratic experience…,” CNN legal analysis and criminal defense attorney, Mark O’Mara remarks, “…it can use polishing.” Within these months and even years to follow, The Justice Department will be forced to grapple and respond to these harsh realities facing our nation today as it pertains to justice and discrimination.

Categories
News

Terrorist Attack in Nairobi, Kenya

Last week’s terrorist attack at the Westgate Mall in Kenya hit me hard. Kenya is my second home. I grew up in that beautiful country. It is a modernized nation where most people attend churches on Sunday and believe strongly in peace. I went to high school there, taught there, married there and two of my children were born there. Some of my children and grandchildren presently live in Nairobi. How can I comprehend the vicious terrorist attack on the Westgate Mall – a place where I dined on roasted chicken last year?

Courtesy of theguardian.co.uk
Courtesy of huffingtonpost.com

It started at 12:00 noon local time on Saturday, September 21 – a time when the mall was full of shoppers and diners. Gangs of men wearing black turbans stormed three entrances simultaneously. They threw grenades and fired indiscriminately using high-powered assault rifles. There was pandemonium as people hid or tried to flee. Many were taken as hostages. In some cases the terrorists asked people to name their religion. Muslims were released while Christians were executed. The terrorists ensconced themselves in the inner shops of the 6-story mall. The Kenyan police and army arrived and the battle went on for 4 days and nights. In the end over 1,000 traumatized people managed to escape, but the Kenyan Red Cross has confirmed that 67 people have died, over 150 were wounded and 35 are still unaccounted for. The terrorists were estimated to number about 15. Five of them were eventually killed by Kenyan police and the other 10 were supposedly taken into custody. The mall itself was bombed and completely destroyed.

An Indian blogger stated, “The Westgate Mall atrocity defies analysis.” He is right, but let me try. A shadowy organization named el-Shabab has taken credit for the killings. Who is el-Shabab? They are a radical Muslim group based out of Somalia and are known to have links to al-Qaeda. Somalia has been at civil war for the past 20 years. It is a failed state with various clans fighting for control. Somalia is Kenya’s neighbor to the northeast. During the various phases of the civil war many Somali people (primarily women and children) have fled to refugee camps in Kenya. Dabaab is presently the largest refugee camp in the world with over half a million people squatting in the harsh desert. For a short time in 2010 el-Shabab controlled Somalia. At that point they invaded Kenya, attacking various villages and refugee camps. Kenya regarded this as a violation of their sovereign rights so in 2011 the government sent troops into Somalia to punish el-Shabab. Over time Kenya helped free Kismayu and eventually Mogadishu from el-Shabab. El-Shabab vowed revenge. So this attack on the Nairobi mall can be regarded primarily as revenge, but also as a form of publicity – we are still here and we are dangerous.

There have been small attacks by el-Shabab over the past two years with grenades thrown into public places in Nairobi. Kenya has been on alert with double security checks at the airports and metal detectors at store entrances and at sporting events. But the attack on the mall was much bigger. It was well planned. The terrorists chose a mall that was Israeli owned and was frequented by wealthy Kenyans and foreigners. The terrorists even rented a shop in the mall, giving them passes and free access. They were able to bring in large weapons through the back service elevators. During the 4-day siege they were even in Internet connection with people outside the mall.

So where does Kenya go from here? There are hard questions to be asked. To start with, what has happened to the terrorists taken into custody?  Are they being questioned? Did they make some kind of deal? There are rumors that the terrorists escaped through an underground sewer system and have returned to Somalia. There are further rumors stating that some of these terrorists came from Somali communities based in Britain and America. And what about security in the future? In addition to the many Somalis living legally in Nairobi as Kenyan citizens, there are also another 30,000 Somali people living there illegally and over 1 million more living in the Kenyan desert. Documenting people is difficult and the country of Kenya is full of soft targets. And yet nobody wants to live in fear and a lock-down mode.

The recent terrorist attack has unified Kenya. The 67 people killed came from many nations and included President Kenyatta’s nephew, two Canadian diplomats, and the renowned poet from Ghana, Kofi Awoonor – aged 78. Even during the siege hundreds of Kenyans showed up to pray, give blood, and donate thousands of shillings to pay for funerals. This past week there was a large inter-faith prayer rally led by religious leaders who were Hindu, Muslim, and Christians. A cleric who spoke confirmed this unity by stating, “We are one people and one nation”.