By Micheal Jordan
Because of print turnaround time, I’m writing this before Tuesday’s presidential election. You are reading this after the election, and so you know more than I do about how it went. Some of you are probably pretty excited for the future of America; others of you are hurting and confused, maybe even angry. No doubt almost all of you feel misunderstood and concerned. Because of the way elections happen now in America, we are all encouraged to think the worst of each other, and any attempt to truly understand what another person thinks is understood as weakness. And you can’t get elected if you’re weak.
Sometimes we try to solve this by talking about how people are more important than issues. Since there are good people on both sides of an issue, we reason that we shouldn’t really treat the issues as very important in the end. Let’s not let issues divide us.
That doesn’t really work for me. Sometimes, following Jesus means taking a side. The issues that divide America—and divide towns, and churches, and families, and even Houghton—are substantial. The life of the unborn matters. Poverty matters; it grinds away at communities, and when we ignore poverty so that we can feel more connected with each other, the poor suffer. Our inability to speak honestly about race, and to make amends for racism, matters. The gross inequality and at times abject failure of our public school system matters, as does Christians’ response to this tragedy. War around the world matters, and American response to wars matters. All of it matters, and when we say it doesn’t matter so that we can enjoy a peaceful life together, we lose the ability to shine Jesus’ light into these issues and many more.
So how do we do life together if we don’t agree? It’s not like the only two choices are “ignore it” or “think the worst of each other.” I think the way forward is to start with each of us, individually.
Think about your choices in this election. Who did you favor? Why? Somewhere along the way, you learned to fear what would happen if the other person won. Usually, the way we try to solve our lack of unity is to remind each other that this fear is baseless, because there are good people on both sides, or because God is still on the throne no matter who wins.
But a better way to solve our lack of unity is not to minimize the other side’s error; instead, we should be more honest about the fact that our own side also has errors. You probably know this in your head, because all of us would say that we don’t have a perfect candidate. But in order to justify our choices, we minimize our candidate’s weaknesses to feel better about voting for them. We tell ourselves that the situation is so dire, so bad, that we have to vote for someone who’s not perfect.
Yes, of course. We have to vote for someone who’s not perfect. That’s life. But in what way are you working against the imperfections that you perceived in your candidate? If you really think your candidate isn’t perfect, then do more than just tell me you had to vote for them. Tell me how you are planning to build a world that mitigates their errors and weaknesses.
Are you pro-life, but had to hold your nose and vote for Kamala? I get it. But let’s dig deeper than just justifying your choice. What are you doing to dig in and help the pro-life cause? Put your money where your mouth is and show me.
On the other hand, are you bothered by some of Trump’s attitudes and statements, but felt you had to hold your nose and vote for him? I get it. But don’t just justify your choice. Show me what you will do to work against misogyny, or how you will welcome and care for immigrants and strangers in your communities.
Life gives all of us imperfect choices almost all the time. Christians don’t live only in the city of God, but the city of man, and life here is tricky. But following Jesus in a deep, radical way means more than just recognizing other people’s errors. It means looking at our own hearts and recognizing the ways that our own choices have consequences for other people.
We understand this interpersonally. If I have an anger problem, it’s not enough for me to snap in anger sometimes and say, “well, that’s just the way I am, and other people ought not to make me angry.” Instead, I need to think about the way that my anger problem impacts my wife, my kids, my students, and work to be sure that my anger hurts them as little as possible.
This goes for us politically as well. Hard choices, hard times. The cross is hard too—hard wood, hard nails. As we observe and experience the cross, we learn to grieve our own complicity. Then we find God’s healing; and then we can stop building others’ kingdoms, and start building His. ★